The US did the right thing in welcoming Chinese President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) offer of cross-strait talks as a "step in the right direction," even if Hu's precondition that Taiwan accept its "one China" vision was quickly rejected. The US was also correct to emphasize that "it is up to the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to decide the terms and conditions under which exchanges, dialogue and consultations occur."
Why doesn't the US go even further and admit Taiwan's right to ignore China if it wants to? What is stopping the US from insisting that China respect Taiwan's rights as a sovereign nation?
Like many countries during the age of imperialism from the 17th through 20th centuries, Taiwan was colonized by larger powers. But by now, most of the nations that once colonized Taiwan, including Japan, Spain and Portugal, have long lost their colonies.
Yet Taiwan remains a colony of China in the sense that the Republic of China (ROC), which lost control of its home territory in 1949, continues to govern the only colony -- in fact the only place at all -- that it occupies. As the victor in China over the ROC, the People's Republic of China believes Taiwan belongs to it. How do the people of the island feel about this? No one knows for sure; unlike the US territory of Puerto Rico, no one has ever asked them.
The US is not obligated under any treaty to view Taiwan as a colony. We are absolutely free under international law to play the role of champions of democracy.
But very few Americans think of the Taiwanese as victims of imperialism. It is not difficult to understand the confusion in the US over the issue of Taiwan. If Taiwan is the ROC, then it is part of a mob of warlords and crooks that had a horrendous record in China before being expelled. But if you see Taiwan as colonized by the ROC, it is also a victim of that mob, and it deserves our support.
Michael Falick
Colorado Springs, Colorado
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS