In almost 20 years of research, it has been the home of some of the most daring ideas to aid exploration: space elevators, crops that could grow on Mars and a shield to protect our planet from global warming. But now NASA's Institute of Advanced Concepts (NIAC) has fallen victim to a very down-to-earth problem -- a lack of money.
The US space agency is set to close its futuristic ideas factory as part of a cost-cutting exercise that it hopes will help pay for ambitious plans to explore the moon and Mars. Bobby Mitchell, who works at NIAC's headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, said: "From what I understand, NASA are out of money. We haven't got an official notice yet but we have heard from NASA that they are going to discontinue funding."
Former NASA scientist Keith Cowing said the decision to close NIAC was "just plain stupid."
Writing on his NASA Watch Web site, he directed comments to NASA's administrator, Mike Griffin: "Advanced spacesuits ... will open the surface of the moon -- and then Mars -- to meaningful and productive human exploration."
"Where are you going to get all of the things you need to put on those Ares rockets so as to allow their crews to carry out their missions, Mike? Or do you `just need a good map?' Explorers without the right tools die -- or turn around -- and head back home. Wrong answer, Mike," Cowling wrote.
NIAC was set up in 1988 as a way to brainstorm revolutionary ideas that go beyond anything NASA does today. It draws US$4 million every year from the agency's US$16 billion budget and funds about a dozen projects every year for long-term ideas, things that could come to fruition within 10 to 40 years.
The institute is most interested in grand visions and big ideas that might inspire new technologies -- and scientists have traditionally been told they should not feel encumbered by what is possible today. Ideas where the technology to make something work has not yet been developed or the science is not entirely understood are welcomed.
Despite this wide remit, NIAC has kickstarted several ideas that have subsequently been picked up for further development by NASA.
Most recently, NASA got interested in a NIAC project called the New Worlds Imager, a space probe designed to take pictures of planets outside our solar system.
Taking such pictures is difficult because light coming from the planets is obscured by stars. To get around this, Webster Cash, of the University of Colorado at Boulder, planned a pair of spacecraft -- a starshade, which is the astronomical equivalent of sunglasses, and a collector -- that works as a giant pinhole camera.
The starshade would be 0.8km in diameter with a 10m hole at its center and would sit more than 200,000km from the collector, blocking the stars' dazzling light.
Wendy Boss and Amy Grunden, microbiologists at North Carolina State University, worked on NIAC-funded projects that looked at ways of growing food on other planets.
Taking her inspiration from organisms that live in the most extreme environments on Earth, Grunden genetically modified plants such as rye. In theory, astronauts on long missions could take the GM seeds with them, saving on the cost of taking food supplies into space.
Many of NIAC's projects fall into the realm of science fiction. The institute is famously home to the space elevator, an idea first proposed by Arthur Clarke in his 1978 novel Fountains of Paradise, to transport people and equipment cheaply into space.
In the NIAC proposal, a cable would be attached from the ground to a satellite in geostationary orbit around the Earth. Vehicles could then climb the tether and escape gravity without the need for rockets. But no one has yet designed materials that would be strong enough for the elevator to work.
Robert Angel of the University of Arizona was recently funded to look into creating a 1,988km wide shield to protect the Earth from the sun's rays and counteract global warming.
"Such a space-based solution might become an urgent priority, worth trillions of dollars if abrupt climate failures appear otherwise inevitable," he wrote in the outline for this project. "We propose to identify near-term research and space missions needed to understand whether a shield could be completed within a few decades at an affordable cost."
Martin Barstow, head of physics and astronomy at Leicester University in Britain, said it was important to have a mechanism for scientists to think about radical ideas.
"It's important that people have the freedom to be able to do this [but] I don't think you need a separate entity. You just need the mental framework, the capacity for people to have time made available," he said.
NASA has been reorganizing its activities since 2004, to pay for the technology it needs to meet its goal of getting humans back to the moon and then on to Mars.
The plans include developing the new Orion exploration vehicle, shaped like the Apollo space capsules last used in 1972 but three times bigger, to replace the space shuttle, and two new Ares I rockets that will blast the astronauts and equipment separately into space.
NASA has slashed more than US$300 million from the International Space Station's science budget and many robotic exploration missions have been either canceled or put on indefinite hold.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS