The Chinese Petroleum Corp (CPC) is planning to change its name to the CPC, Taiwan ("MOEA launches state-run name change campaign," Feb. 3, page 1).
However, the new name seems to suggest that the company is a Taiwanese subsidiary of CPC in China. Therefore the stated purpose of the name change -- to avoid confusion -- is not served at all.
There is no need to keep the old acronym (CPC) either, because people will still refer to the company as the Chinese Petroleum Corp. Likewise, Kentucky Fried Chicken has been renamed KFC for years, but people still remember its old name.
To avoid further confusion, it would be advisable to change CPC to Taiwan Petroleum Corp (TPC). In the last few decades, the world's largest oil company has changed its name from Esso to Exxon and Exxon Mobil. The name change to Exxon even involved litigation. Changing CPC to TPC would be much easier and less costly.
The proposed new name for China Shipbuilding Corp (CSBC) is Taiwan Shipbuilding Corp, but it was reported that the old acronym, CSBC, will be kept. If so, this will simply mean more confusion, implying that China is Taiwan and vice versa. Let's keep it simple and use TSBC as the acronym for the new name.
Similarly, China Airlines should be rechristened Taiwan Airlines. China Steel should be changed to Taiwan Steel and the nation's Olympic team should change its awkward "Chinese Taipei" title to "Taiwan."
If Taiwan wants official independence, it can declare independence from the Republic of China and change its name to Republic of Taiwan. This name change will unify the national identity. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should also consider changing its name to the Taiwanese Nationalist Party or the Nationalist Party if it does not want to be considered a foreign political party.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS