On Sept. 9, Wang Lie-ping (王麗萍), spokeswoman of the Million Voices Against Corruption demonstration initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德), was booed off the podium when she said that, "The people of the Republic of Taiwan will not be defeated by some rain."
Upon hearing Wang's remark, Shih grimaced and the throng of demonstrators demanded an apology, for they found the term "Republic of Taiwan" totally unacceptable. Afterwards, to pacify the disgruntled demonstrators, Shih and his campaign staff offered solemn apologies.
On Sept. 12, Liao Lin-Li-lin (廖林麗玲) and Chen Tsan-hung (陳燦鴻), Taiwan Solidarity Union candidates for the year-end Taipei City Councilor elections, visited Shih and asked him to support the governments efforts to join the UN using the name "Taiwan."
Surprisingly, Shih angrily rebuked the two, wondering where were they in the past when he himself had proposed that Taiwan join the UN under the name Taiwan.
It turns out that the name "Republic of Taiwan" can only be used among certain people.
When Israel fell, the Israeli people were heartbroken and filled with regret.
As seen in Psalms 137:5-6, a poet describe his feelings in the words, "If I forget you, Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its dexterity. Let my tongue cleave to my palate if I will not remember you, if I will not bring to mind Jerusalem during my greatest joy."
Someone who has called himself an "omnipotent warrior" has ended up offering solemn apologies when someone speaks up for the ideals that he himself held to in the past. We have finally understood that the meaning of truth may change depending on the person.
The last paragraph of the Million Voices Against Corruption campaign declaration pledges to rebuild the core values of a civic society. I assumed that seeking President Chen Shui-bian's (
We are finding, however, that these standards only apply to certain people and political parties. When applied to the campaign itself, they immediately turn into "political persecution."
Although the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan has made it clear throughout the anti-Chen campaign that we hope to see the establishment of a political and legal system that conforms to the principles of faith, and that we are not supporting a "certain people," we still receive abusive and threatening phone calls.
If you do not have the right to freely express yourself on the land where you were born; if you do not have the right to identify with that land; if you are being attacked and forced to apologize by a social movement claiming to be "peaceful and rational" for adhering to your own ideals; if that movement threatens and oppresses others simply because they do not share its ideals -- can that movement still be called a social movement and claim to adhere to the values of "love, peace and non-violence?"
If it can, Taiwan's democracy is a disaster.
Andrew Chang is the secretary-general of the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.