One of the more disgraceful episodes in the last local government elections saw a group of doctors from Taichung Veterans General Hospital call a press conference and declare that Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (
This betrayal of ethics and basic decency was compounded when Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) figureheads -- including President Chen Shui-bian (
Hu appropriately filed suit against the doctors, and this week Taichung prosecutors announced that the case would not be pursued, citing lack of evidence, and that it was legitimate for the doctors to pursue a political agenda in this case. They admitted, however, that the records that were presented by the doctors were genuine.
It is extraordinary that prosecutors dismissed the case on the basis that there was no proof of connections between these doctors and the doctors who treated Hu. In any other context, the sale or use of stolen goods is a crime, and it is not necessary that the link between the original theft and the subsequent use of material be made for a crime to be established. When it is medical records that are misappropriated, it seems, things are different.
Some of the doctors have responded to the decision with relief but also something considerably less than contrition, maintaining that holders of higher office should be subjected to medical checks, and other such nonsense. It is clear that the professional punishments that the doctors received have not sunk in and that the most important thing is to save face.
The grisly truth is that hospital administrators around the country have been tarnished by this decision, and they will need to be vigilant in order that similarly ill-motivated doctors, nurses or other staff do not compromise patient privacy in future. Based on the Taichung case, those who steal or misuse medical records for political purposes all of a sudden can avoid prosecution because legal technicalities appeal to some parts of the justice system more than conducting professional investigative work.
In the interest of Taichung readers, it is appropriate that these doctors be named for the record. They are: DPP Legislator Lin Chin-hsing (
Hu deserves praise for considerable grace under fire on a matter so close to his mortality. The doctors -- who by any ethical standard have shown themselves to be unfit to practice medicine -- exploited his misfortune to make a political point that in itself was a repugnant slur against every person who has had a serious illness.
Yet Hu has declared he will not pursue the matter, asking instead that the medical profession desist from such behavior. If only more of our mediocre politicians displayed such leadership.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS