Two years ago the Chinese non-governmental organization (NGO) Green Watershed successfully led a fight to halt construction of hydropower stations along the pristine banks of the Nujiang river.
But its victory was pyrrhic.
While the temporary stay it secured on the power project is still in place, Green Watershed lost it its operating license and its founder Yu Xiaogang (
As the group found, opposing local officials is fraught with risk.
While China has vowed to step up protection of its heavily degraded environment, local politics all too often trump national policy and effective independent policing, environmentalists say.
The group's troubles began two years ago when it called on the central government to review the planned construction of 13 hydropower stations along the Nujiang, one of only two of China's major rivers that still run dam-free.
DAMNING PROJECT
If all dams were to be completed along the river, which is on the UN's list of Protected Areas, they would extend 700km and produce more than 100 billion kilowatts per hour of electricity to feed China's voracious appetite for power.
The Thanlwin, as the river is called in Burmese, originates on the snowy peaks of Tibet, its azure, angry waters wending 2,400km through steep terraced canyons in southwestern China and then Myanmar before emptying into the Andaman Sea.
China's more than 22,000 dams already comprise 46 percent of the world's total, according to the UN Environmental Program (UNEP).
Although the UNEP has given its eco-friendly stamp of approval to many of China's dams projects in the past, environmentalists at Green Watershed argue that damming the Nujiang would damage the local environment, threatening the area's fragile eco-balance as the reservoirs flood fertile land.
New dams could also wipe out fish species whose migration routes to traditional breeding grounds would be blocked, but perhaps more importantly would threaten millions of livelihoods, the group said.
Determined to make the Beijing listen, Yu, who founded Green Watershed in 2002, began to drum up support in the community by letting residents know about plans spearheaded by state-run China Huadian Corp, one of the country's largest power groups.
Yu took residents to Lancan river, known in Southeast Asia as the Mekong, to let them see the impoverishing effects on the populace living around the Manwan dam, a hydro station active since 1993. They also went to Beijing for discussions with the government.
RISING CONCERNS
At the time of the conflict, a confluence of concerns about China's over-investment in industry and the effects of environmental damage wrought by 25 years of heated economic development played into the hands of Green Watershed's campaign.
Increasingly concerned that the nation's economic growth model was environmentally unsustainable -- an issue that was high on the agenda during the National People's Congress -- Beijing began to heed warnings from the State Environmental Protection Agency and NGOs like Yu's.
Premier Wen Jiabao (
Yunnan officials were not amused.
"One deputy governor of Yunnan Province said in a very public occasion that Green Watershed ... had damaged Yunnan's hydropower development plan, and therefore damaged the economic development of the entire province," Yu said.
Their wrath turned on Yu and his employees. Attempts to curtail the organization's influence led to spying, harassment and the revoking of the group's license, he said.
"We've been operating as an unqualified organization for some time, as of a couple of years ago, the government said we were unqualified," Yu said.
HARASSMENT
Officials didn't stop there, however.
"I've been banned from traveling abroad -- they limit my freedom. It's been like this for over one year," Yu said. "Each time I tried police stopped me at the airport. When I asked them why, they just told me there was no reason."
"I can't go to the places that would become reservoirs and I can't get in touch with people living in that region -- the government forbids us to do that," he said.
"They said that we are causing trouble for them by going to those places," he said.
An official from Yunnan Provincial Bureau of Civil Affairs in charge of NGOs refused to comment.
Over the last few years, authorities have looked upon NGOs as somewhat benign organizations that can help the government solve common ills such as prostitution, addiction and domestic violence.
FINE LINE
But Yu's case is a stark reminder of the fine line between aid and interference in business the government deems as exclusively theirs.
"We know what kind of things we can do and what kind of things we can't do," said Wang Yongchen (
"We are now calling for all the procedures to be carried out according to law, but if they [government body] do not want to do it then we can't do anything about it," said Wang, who played major role in getting Wen to suspend the Nujiang project.
Xue Ye (薛野), director of Beijing-based Friend of Nature, which also opposes the Nujiang project, said that Green Watershed's case was typical.
"Actually it is how the local governments usually reacts," Xue said.
"If they say something bad about the government, then the government will punish them," Xue said.
"It's not that Chinese NGOs don't want to adopt a Greenpeace-like approach, it's that China doesn't have the conditions yet," Xue said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS