Ever since the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lost the Dec. 3 local government elections, those who care about Taiwan and pro-localization political parties have called on the DPP to get serious about reform and win back popular support. Until it does, it cannot stand up to the ever-growing threat posed by China.
The party cannot allow this defeat to tear apart localization forces within the nation. Such an outcome would only boost the momentum of the pro-China forces, with serious implications for the next generation. In the space of just a few days following the election, the party leadership was plunged into internal conflict. In fact, the infighting within the party has descended into farce -- which doesn't bode well for the future of Taiwan.
Having suffered the recent election debacle, the DPP did indeed show signs of wanting to change. DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (
Following the elections, Chen even mentioned in a public speech the importance of reforming the 18 percent preferential rates enjoyed by retired public servants.
Regrettably, these attempts to revamp the party were but a flash in the pan. In the last few days we saw an even more ludicrous farce unfold when Chen asked Premier Frank Hsieh (
This didn't stop Hsieh and his aides from telling the media that he had accepted Chen's request to remain in office. In view of this, we cannot help but wonder if Hsieh has truly understood the negative impact that the government's failings had on the elections, or if he ever really intended to resign from his post.
The second farce took place when Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
Moreover, the president should not care too much about who fills the acting chairperson post. Unfortunately, the misunderstanding between Chen and Lu is so serious that it has deteriorated into a long litany of criticisms about each other made through the media.
Voters have taught the DPP a lesson in the recent poll, in the hope that the party can genuinely pursue reform, hold on to the drive toward localization, address its failings and continue to fight for Taiwanese awareness. While conducting an internal review, the DPP should discuss the future development of the party, what ideals the party should uphold, and the policy it wants to follow to appeal to the public. It needs to consider how to ensure and protect the interests of all Taiwanese if it is to live up to their expectations.
However, Hsieh's claims of being asked to stay on as premier and the verbal brawl between Chen and Lu just go to show how DPP heavyweights are scrambling for power, even to the extent that they have allowed themselves a public display of emotions. This has not only shifted the focus away from reform itself, it has also offended the party's supporters.
To be sure, even if the DPP was united, it still might not be able to defeat the KMT, currently led by Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the 2008 presidential elections. Given this fact, it is very disappointing to see the president and the vice president engaging in such pointless bickering.
Therefore, these two national leaders must stop their quarreling. The DPP should also review its policies as well as its morals to regain people's confidence. If this farce is allowed to continue, the nation will only plunge into turmoil, with DPP supporters eventually abandoning the party.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS