A report recently released by the Educational Testing Service (ETS) shows that Taiwanese students' average score of 203 on the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) ranked 21st among Asian nations -- sixth from the bottom in Asia for three consecutive years.
Among the four "Asian Tigers", students from Singapore topped the rankings with an average score of 252, while those from Hong Kong ranked 13th (216), and those from South Korea ranked 17th (213). Students from China also ranked 17th with an average score of 213.
Several factors may have contributed to Taiwan's disappointing test results. First, Taiwan used to be known for high TOEFL scores thanks to students' test-taking skills. But after the ETS changed its test format to include essay writing in all computer-based tests, Taiwanese students' average score has clearly dropped. This development indicates that although their listening and reading comprehension are satisfactory, their writing ability is insufficient.
Second, the total number of Taiwanese students taking TOEFL has sharply declined from 44,213 to 21,917 over the past five years. This is a result of both the nation's economic downturn, and the rapidly growing number of Taiwan's higher education institutions. Under such circumstances, many excellent students have chosen to continue their advanced education in Taiwan in order to save money, and their absence in the test would certainly affect students' average score.
Third, Taiwanese students' English proficiency usually drops after they enter college. Once our students enter college or university, they seldom have any chance to learn or use English, apart from taking the required general education English course in their freshman year. Because of the lack of practice, the English ability of college students is even inferior to that of high school students.
This problem may become much worse after the ETS includes an oral test when it launches Internet-based testing next year. Taiwanese students' listening and speaking ability have improved in recent years, as their teachers begin to value the significance of conversational communication. But many students are still unable to take part in class discussions and express their opinions smoothly.
Both schools and students have a responsibility to improve this. Schools should offer more English courses and encourage students to take them. They should also encourage teachers to use English textbooks or conduct their courses in English. They need to adopt an "ability-grouping system" and place their students into different levels of classes, rather than mixing them together.
Students should take more English courses and seize every opportunity to practice outside the classroom. They should also adjust their learning style and learn to express their opinions in front of others. This is particularly difficult for some students who tend to learn passively, so the guidance and encouragement of teachers are crucial.
Most importantly, students should create an English environment around them and develop independent thinking. For example, they can watch television commentary shows in English and then try to express their own opinions freely. They can also write diaries and weekly journals in English, to practice their writing skills and independent thinking.
Hopefully, Taiwanese students can improve not only their learning strategies but also their learning styles when acquiring English, so that our English proficiency will not lag behind in Asia anymore.
Chang Sheng-en is a lecturer of English at Shih Chien University and National Taipei College of Business.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS