The nations of Southeast Asia have signed a range of agreements with China which will culminate with the possible creation of a ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (FTA) in 2010, giving China access to the 1.8 billion-person ASEAN market. Southeast Asia has come to resemble China's back yard as a result of Beijing's efforts to create harmony with its neighbors.
Some analysts see China's recent Southeast Asian policies as a kind of Monroe Doctrine with Chinese characteristics. The characteristics of this policy are the generous "offerings" made to Southeast Asia in exchange for long-term benefits, the creation of an image that it is a friendly and peaceful hegemony, and constantly reiterating the "one China" policy.
We should be concerned over the potential economic and commercial impact this arrangement has on Taiwan. Given that Taiwan is a member of the WTO, such impact may be reduced by means of the development of a multilateral trade system. But the diplomatic and psychological impact of China's "Monroe Doctrine" may be more direct and severe -- which, of course, is China's intent.
China has already been successful in marginalizing Taiwan diplomatically. The consequences of China's ties with Southeast Asia may be the result of a vicious cycle from which Taiwan will find it difficult to escape.
Looking at Taiwan's "go south" policy, we can see that too much emphasis was put on economic and commercial benefits, with no real policy to dissuade people from investing in China. The policy failed to build connections with Southeast Asian countries, and has made no progress toward signing free trade agreements with them.
In addition to China's obstructionism, the reason why relations between Taiwan and Southeast Asia have been stagnant is Taiwan's insufficient effort to engage those countries, and even a tendency to withdraw from engagement. This is a result of limited diplomatic personnel and resources, a lack of long-term interpersonal networks and unfamiliarity with Southeast Asian languages and culture.
There is little reason for this situation. Moreover, I believe Taiwan has at least three advantages in establishing relations with Southeast Asian nations.
First, China's diplomatic offensive in Southeast Asia can be countered by Taiwan's comparative advantage in commerce. Moreover, Taiwan can engage in trade-based diplomacy with Asian nations by offering them a generalized system of preferences to promote relations.
Second, geopolitically speaking, Taiwan should reinforce its claims to the South China Sea. By making forceful claims to sovereignty in this region, Taiwan will force Southeast Asia to take note of Taiwan and respect its geopolitical links to the region. This will increase engagement and also enhance our bargaining leverage in negotiations.
As a result, Southeast Asian nations may be willing to sign treaties of cooperation with Taiwan or make agreements regarding standards of conduct in the South China Sea.
Third, while the number of foreign spouses (mainly wives) from Southeast Asia has increased, the policies aimed at them are mostly related to issues of family, education, society and culture. From a long-term perspective, these spouses and their children are an asset to Taiwan, because they can promote better understanding and improved relations with Southeast Asia. After all, intercultural marriages are the most profound form of cultural integration. The children of such marriages will play a crucial role in advancing relations between Taiwan and Southeast Asia.
Johnny Chiang is an assistant professor in the department of political science at Soochow University.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS