Carlos Ribagorda does not appear to be a man who suffers from learning difficulties; a journalist for a Spanish business magazine, he has just published a book on young rightwing politicians. Four years ago, however, he won a Paralympic gold medal in Sydney as a member of Spain's learning-disabled basketball team.
A few weeks later Ribagorda sent his medal back to the Paralympic headquarters in Bonn. He also returned his Spanish team kit and the UK ?150 spending money he had been given. For, he explained, he was just one of 10 members of the 12-man squad who had absolutely nothing wrong with them. He had simply been "signed up" to boost his country's chances of winning a medal. His revelations shocked the Paralympics -- held every four years by the city that hosts the full Olympics -- shredding its image as the benevolent moment of the international sporting calendar.
ILLUSTRATION: YU SHA
The shockwaves are still being felt and athletes with learning difficulties have been banned from competing in the Athens Paralympics.
In the Paralympics, just as in the Olympics, people cheat. It was not just the Spanish basketball team that was stuffed with frauds in Sydney, according to Ribagorda. Two swimmers on the Spanish team as well as a table tennis player and at least one track and field athlete were not, as they claimed, learning disabled, he says.
Complaints, inevitably, began to spread. "There were two or three players from both Spain and Russia who could have competed in our national basketball league," complained one Australian coach. "What they did with, and without, the ball was way above what any of our athletes could have achieved." Ribagorda, who helped beat the Russians in the final, agreed.
"There were three players in the Russian team, especially one of them, who were just too good," he says.
Ribagorda says he was invited to train in Madrid with the basketball team five months before the Sydney games and saw an opportunity for a journalistic scoop.
"There were five months of training with not a single disabled person in sight. The two genuinely disabled players came from outside Madrid," he says.
Some of his new teammates had already been to a world championship in Brazil. Ribagorda himself went to Portugal with the team. But the big prize was Sydney.
"I think people saw it as a free trip to Australia. There was even some pride at wearing the Spanish team strip [uniform]," he says.
In their first match, the team played too well and, when more than 30 points ahead at half-time, were ordered by their coach to slow down their scoring and let the other team shoot more. But their biggest mistake was to win gold -- part of a haul that put Spain third in the medal table behind the US and Britain. A photo appeared on the front page of the popular Madrid sports daily, Marca. Rumors began to circulate that some players, including the coach of an amateur team, had been recognized, as people without learning difficulties.
They were advised by officials to wear dark glasses and hats and grow beards in order to pass unnoticed at the team's triumphal return home at Madrid's Barajas airport. Then Ribagorda blew the whistle. The halo of saintliness that accompanies the Paralympics, which started out at Stoke Mandeville hospital, north of London, England, as the International Wheelchair games in 1948, lost its shine. It was a startling reversal for a UK ?29 million event which Australians had supported with heart-warming enthusiasm, buying 1.2 million tickets.
Fingers soon began to point at one of the most powerful men worldwide in the field of disabled sport, Fernando Martin Vicente. A former Madrid city councillor, he was a member of the International Paralympic Committee's (IPC) ruling executive and vice-president of Spain's Paralympic committee. He was also head of one of the six international federations of disabled athletes that make up the Paralympic family INAS-FID -- the International Sports Organization for Persons with an Intellectual Disability.
In 1975 Vicente, the father of a disabled child, founded the National Association of Special Sports (Ande), dedicated to disabled sports. Every year it reportedly received huge sums of state cash.
While Ande grew, Vicente's personal wealth also increased. El Mundo newspaper tried, but failed, to prove that there was a connection, claiming his wealth had reached UK ?five million. Martin, it said, owned a yacht, eight cars, including a Porsche, five houses and half a dozen large pieces of land.
Vicente protested his innocence, then resigned. His case is now in the Spanish courts. Contacted by the London-based Guardian newspaper last Tuesday, he angrily denied making money from disabled sports. "It is very sad. There was no bad intent," he insisted before adding that he, as head of INAS-FID, had been too important to get involved in checking the credentials of individual players.
The IPC eventually set up its own investigating committee.
"It was only just this sport," explains IPC media director Miriam Wilkens."It was just the Spanish team."
But all learning disabled athletes were banned until INAS-FID could come up with a way of making sure there was no further cheating. Its proposals have, so far, fallen short of what the IPC wants.
"A lot of athletes around the world are devastated by that," says Nick Parr, chief executive of the English Sports Association for People with Learning Difficulties. "This goes beyond disappointment.
"They have trouble understanding. There are English athletes who think that, as they are being punished, they must have done something wrong," he says.
He worries that people with learning difficulties may now be permanently excluded from the games, insisting "as long as there is a system in place, there is no reason why the athletes should not compete in the Paralympics."
The Paralympics, however, is not the only international sports organization for learning-disabled athletes. The International Olympic Committee has also given its backing to a separate games for them -- the Special Olympics.
"The Special Olympics is not an elitist sports organization. People of all levels of ability can compete," says Kirsten Suto, its spokeswoman in Washington. "The philosophy is all about doing one's own personal best."
In practical terms, that means dividing athletes into divisions so they compete against those of similar ability and, if they improve, can move up a division to compete against more capable athletes.
"We like the spirit of competition, but we don't focus on medal counts, or countries doing best. We focus on the individual and their accomplishment" Suto says.
The Sydney scandal provoked "sadness," she says.
"We are always sad when people aren't true sportsmen and don't take sports seriously by faking and ridiculing it,"she says.
Even though athletes with learning difficulties are barred en masse from Athens,we are unlikely to have seen the end of Paralympic cheating. The Sydney games also turned up 11 doping cases. Medals were taken away from, among others, the US runner Brian Frasure and the Azerbaijani powerlifter Gundus Ismailov. Ismailov had been taking both nandrolone, an anabolic steroid, and methandienone. Frasure, billed as "the world's fastest amputee", had also been taking nandrolone. At the winter Paralympics two years ago in Salt Lake City, Germany's skier Thomas Oelsner had to return two gold medals after a doping scandal.
One of the mottos for the Athens Paralympics is "spirit in motion". Organizers and, above all, the 4,000 athletes from 143 nations will be hoping that, for the 11 days of competition, nothing more is done to deflate that spirit.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS