In the above article, "Music and politics are inseparable," Ho Tung-hung (
First, the article proposes that politics and music are insepar-able. Shocked's brave anti-US and anti-war position moved people to admiration, and her lyrics display a deep concern for social issues. While A-mei, on the other hand, has bowed to China and admitted to having committed a mistake by singing the ROC anthem at President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) 2000 inauguration.
Here, I want to say that the idea of music and social engagement as mutual reflections of each other is but one way for artists to express themselves, but not the only way. To put it another way, there is nothing inherently good or bad, right or wrong in the difference between singer Luo Da-you's (羅大佑) lyrical social criticisms and Fei Yu-ching's (費玉清) performance-oriented singing.
The idea that artists have certain social responsibilities as a result of their popularity is true, but there isn't only one way to act on those responsibilities. During the March presidential election, for example, some artists clearly expressed their green or blue political biases, while others were of the opinion that as artists, being public personalities, should abstain from influencing their audience's political views.
Throughout the so-called A-mei incident, the singer was unwilling to take a strong stand and therefore chose to deal with protests in a low-key manner. To say that she "bowed to China and admitted her mistakes" is going a bit too far. If she committed any mistake, it was her wavering on her legitimate right to sing the national anthem for fear of being labelled a "green artist."
If we were to ask politicians, Taiwanese businesspeople or artists working on either side of the Taiwan Strait about the issue of unification, the status quo or independence for Taiwan, no one would be able to give a clear, satisfactory answer -- so why should we expect A-mei to come out and take a vocal stand?
Further, the article also casts in a negative light A-mei's visits to the disaster areas in the wake of the 921 Earthquake in 1999 and the flood-damaged areas brought on by Tropical Storm Mindulle last month. This is regretful, and it makes us wonder what benevolent and philanthropic actions one must undertake in order to be considered sincere. Ho suspects that A-mei's visit to indigenous people following the earthquake was insincere. He also claims that the singer did not contribute some of the "astronomical amount of money" she makes to the charity benefit for which she performed following last month's flooding disaster, but merely attracted a lot of media attention.
Let's leave aside the issue of the truth about her visits to the disaster areas, since we don't know if the author's understanding of the issue following his own visit is complete. Does charity have to be anonymous, and do donations have to be monetary to be considered sincere? Is it not a positive thing when artists promote public concern for social issues?
Following the 1999 earthquake, many public personalities made generous donations -- including A-mei -- who donated NT$1 million to charity. This time she chose to give a charity concert to solicit donations from the public. Wasn't that a meaningful gesture? When is a charity concert or fund-raising initiative sincere enough to satisfy this author? I don't believe there is a formula for how artists should engage in the public sphere. Thus, it is preposterous to label such charity hypocritical.
Perhaps what we really should examine is how much sincerity other actors, singers or TV show hosts have displayed as they have performed in Taiwan, China and Hong Kong in recent years.
Ethnic Taiwanese born overseas can work freely on either side of the Taiwan Strait when things go well, or work in their home country when things are not going so well. In any case, artists who were born and raised in Taiwan have nowhere else to go. For the Taiwanese people, unfortunately, their nationality still falls in a grey area to some extent, and many people are afraid to confront this issue. I hope that society at large will be able to take a more tolerant approach to musicians who come under political pressure.
Kuang Tsai-yun is a graduate student at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS