The EU recently vetoed a proposal to lift the arms-sales embargo against China and signed a proposal calling on China to remove the missiles targeted at Taiwan. However, during the recent visit by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), French President Jacques Chirac tried hard to curry favor with China by expressing opposition to Taiwan's referendum.
These entirely different and conflicting phenomena have reminded us that we should pay attention to significant changes in the EU's China policy. Among them, several developments are worthy of our attention.
The EU is attempting to make China one of its global strategic partners. This policy has been directed and formulated by a few core countries such as France, Germany and Italy. Last October, France and China even agreed to develop an all-round strategic partnership. France's attempts to sway the EU's China policy are quite evident.
The partnerships established between the EU and China to rival the US' unilateralism in dealing with global affairs have had several obvious consequences.
For example, some countries in the EU as well as China opposed using military force against Iraq.
Also, when the euro was launched, China promised to convert 40 percent of its foreign exchange reserves into the euro and emphasized the necessity of pluralizing global currencies.
Finally, in the Sino-EU summit meeting held recently, both sides decided to expand economic cooperation and set a target trade volume of 200 billion euros by 2010.
What deserves our special attention is the new triangular relationship taking shape between the EU, China and ASEAN. This is evident in the conference attended by European financial ministers last September when the trio jointly refused to support US attempts to pressure China on
the yuan.
However, the EU has yet to map out consistent policies toward China, especially regarding human rights and China's relations with Taiwan. On the contrary, contradictory policies are currently being formulated within the bloc.
Among the EU's internal organizations, the EU Commission tends to forge alliances with China. But the European Parliament chooses to boycott China on grounds of its human rights abuses. Recently it even passed several resolutions friendly to Taiwan.
The policy shift integrating politics with economics has led to a more divided China policy inside the EU. The EU used to adopt a pragmatic policy that separated human rights from trade. But in recent years the European Parliament demanded these two issues be linked, emphasizing that China must improve its human rights record before the EU will consider lifting the ban on arms sales to China.
In the past, the EU insisted
that the bottom line was to maintain peace and military
balance between Taiwan and China. However, several European countries appear to be using Taiwan-China relations as a political bargaining chip in exchange for economic interests. What France did this time serves as an example.
The French government wants to act as a vanguard in the EU
to win over the biggest share of business opportunities China may allocate to Europe.
Even though China will become the center of the EU's East Asia policy, Taiwan need not challenge or fear the EU developing global strategic partnerships with China.
Instead, it should persuade the EU to play a neutral role and a mediator in cross-strait relations, and push the union to de-link its global strategic planning from Taiwan-China relations. Taiwan must persuade the EU that it can protect its economic interests without giving in to China on cross-strait relations.
Nor should Taiwan overly fear France's unilateral tilt toward China. But the government must closely observe as China policy becomes an important diplomatic agenda for the EU. As long as the EU does not draw up policies that jeopardize the balance of power between Taiwan and China in the short term, it is not disadvantageous to make the Taiwan issue a focus on the European stage.
Hao Pei-chih is an assistant professor of public administration and policy at National Taipei University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS