Wu's defense misplaced
Deputy Secretary-General to the President Joseph Wu (
He argues, "To make reconstruction meaningful, we must understand the complex conditions facing Iraq both inside and out ... Over a million people died in the eight years of the Iran-Iraq War. In the final stage of that war, Saddam's attention was diverted by Kurds within Iraq. In order to suppress them, he used mustard gas to attack two Kurdish towns, killing over 100,000 people.
But on the The New York Times' op-ed page of Jan. 31, we read about the most famous gassing of the Kurds, in which an estimated 5,000 people died.
The article reads, "But the truth is, all we know for certain is that Kurds were bombarded with poison gas that day at Halabja. We cannot say with any certainty that Iraqi chemical weapons killed the Kurds. This is not the only distortion in the Halabja story."
The author, Stephen Pelletierre, says that there are no other Iraqi gassings on the order of Halabja that he knows about.
He continues, "I am in a position to know because, as the Central Intelligence Agency's senior political analyst on Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, and as a professor at the Army War College from 1988 to 2000, I was privy to much of the classified material that flowed through Washington having to do with the Persian Gulf. In addition, I headed a 1991 army investigation into how the Iraqis would fight a war against the United States; the classified version of the report went into great detail on the Halabja affair."
Wu writes, "Media images of this atrocity, including one of a father who was holding a child when the gas suffocated them both, are still vividly etched in many people's minds."
Sorry, but that image has been somewhat crowded out by the more recent images of identical tragedies, carried out today by the mailed fist of the world's most powerful government against what has been essentially rendered into a Vietnam-like will to resist. Those images are not only all over the Internet, but even on the front pages of Taiwan's newspapers, for all to see.
Wu concludes, "The people of Taiwan should show their benevolence, have a broad international vision, and make our voices heard for real world peace. We should make the international community understand that Taiwan's support of the US' anti-terrorism stance is for the sake of world peace."
Sorry, again. Peace, as we all should have learned by now, does not come through war. World War I was "the war to end all wars," right? World War II saw the formation of the UN (at FDR's insistence mind you, joining the UN in January 1942 was tantamount to an Allied country's signing on to the Atlantic Charter, which again promised the end of warfare as a means of conflict resolution), and we all know the rest -- many wars were to follow.
This war once again proves the adage that truth is the first casualty -- this time with Wu on the front lines, vainly trying to hold the fort, vainly fending off the voices calling for human rights, simple respect for international law and the end of the killing of the innocents in the name of whatever cause.
Lynn Miles
Lungtan, Taoyuan
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS