Since People magazine produced its list of "losers of the year" last week, we have been mulling what a Taiwanese version would look like. Doing the same thing in Taiwan, of course, provides one with an embarrassment of riches from which to choose; the problem is winnowing such a rich harvest.
First place, surely, must go to Sophie Wang (
Loser number two: Diane Lee (
Loser number three: Christine Tsung (宗才怡). Appointed minister of economic affairs on the strength of little more than her ability to raise funds for Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) in the US, she lasted just 48 days in office. In a written statement, Tsung said she felt like a "rabbit that had mistakenly stumbled into the jungle without any knowledge of the political traps that lay all around."
Fourth place has to go to John Chang (章孝嚴), the man who spent most of December celebrating that he finally had Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) listed as his father on his ID card. Let's see; this is a man who wants to rebuild a political career as a mover and shaker in the KMT -- from where he fell from grace after, believe it or not, an affair with Sophie Wang. How to show commitment to democratic values: get officially recognized as the son of Taiwan's last dictator.
Fifth, perhaps President Chen Shui-bian. It is almost impossible to think of a single accomplishment of Chen's government in the past 12 months. All we have had are a series of wishy-washy economic plans, largely meaningless because the budget is lacking. It is, however, only too easy to think of a number of snafus, for example the bizarre about-face over direct links, and the entire treatment of the farmers' and fishermen's associations' bad-loan problem. What a shame, all that power and no idea how to use it.
Other losers this year include Chang Po-ya (
Last, but not least for our top 10, let's just throw in most of Kaohsiung's city councilors, many of whom are so forgetful they currently can't remember where the millions of dollars they found in their bank accounts last week came from. Not quite as good as last year's top loser, Chu Mei-feng (
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS