The Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) 16th National Congress has produced China's new leadership. But the biggest challenge facing Hu Jintao (
The 16th National Congress reflected two aspects of globalization that have had a deep impact -- Chinese President Jiang Zemin's (
Globalization is destined to turn China into a wealthy and robust civil society. The vitality of China's development will be clearly shown by the nation's massive and vigorous productive forces. Not only will the private sector continue to be allowed to thrive, but it will cooperate with the public sector, becoming the main force of social development. In addition, the party and the Chinese government will cooperate more with business so that together they can boost social development. Also, resources from industry will constantly flow into each and every arena of public policy, becoming a key force behind government decisions. Advanced productive forces will inevitably become an important element in government decision making, which will be significantly influenced by the nation's entrepreneurs.
The congress faced up to this projected course of development, enshrining it in the charter. The demand for the CCP to represent "advanced productive forces" shows that the party is following the ideal of a civil society. It has also shown that China will expand the range of civil groups on every social level, so they can strengthen the vitality of its social development. This will be an important challenge to the "Hu-Wen system."
There is no doubt, however, that the Chinese government's policies and methods make it appear hesitant to develop social organizations. It is important to remember that the development of civil groups, social productivity and private entrepreneurs are the driving force of social development. This is why the "Hu-Wen system" faces a society with strong productivity. But it will now be confronted by private entrepreneurs with powerful voices from within the party. This may lead to an essential change in the CCP's structure and operation. The "Hu-Wen system" must handle this force in such a way as to guide social development, as well as to recruit new blood.
So the party faces a challenging balancing act. If the entre-preneurs within the party are too weak, they will be incapable of pushing the party's policies forward. If too strong, they will severely challenge the existing system and may disturb the balance of power, or even endanger the party's existing systems. The "Hu-Wen system" certainly faces a very difficult situation.
Many new faces have assumed important posts, taking the reins of power at different levels. Many of today's State Council officials were cadre members of Premier Zhu Rongji's (朱鎔基) financial and economic team. Today, we should not be obsessed with the question of whether the Chinese government is able to maintain a structure of "Hu following Jiang's rules" (江規胡隨) or "Wen following Zhu's rules" (朱規溫隨).
Instead, we should distinguish between the varied situations and problems that faced the "Jiang-Zhu system" and those which will face the "Hu-Wen system" under globalization. More importantly, is the "Hu-Wen system" capable of taking control of the new situation, and solving the current problems?
Tsao Jiun-han is a professor of politics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation Premier12 championship is an historic achievement. Yet once again this achievement is marred by the indignity of the imposed moniker “Chinese Taipei.” The absurdity is compounded by the fact that none of the players are even from Taipei, and some, such as Paiwan catcher Giljegiljaw Kungkuan, are not even ethnically Chinese. The issue garnered attention around the Paris Olympics, yet fell off the agenda as Olympic memories retreated. “Chinese Taipei” persists, and the baseball championship serves as a reminder that fighting “Chinese Taipei” must be a continuous campaign, not merely resurfacing around international
This month, the National Health Insurance (NHI) is to implement a major policy change by eliminating the suspension-and-resumption mechanism for Taiwanese residing abroad. With more than 210,000 Taiwanese living overseas — many with greater financial means than those in Taiwan — this reform, catalyzed by a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, underscores the importance of fairness, sustainability and shared responsibility in one of the world’s most admired public healthcare systems. Beyond legal obligations, expatriates have a compelling moral duty to contribute, recognizing their stake in a system that embodies the principle of health as a human right. The ruling declared the prior
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) appears to be encountering some culture shock and safety issues at its new fab in Arizona. On Nov. 7, Arizona state authorities cited TSMC for worker safety violations, fining the company US$16,131, after a man died in May. The Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health released its six-month investigation into the fatality and cited TSMC for failing to keep the workplace free from hazards likely to cause death or serious harm. At about the same time, the chip giant was also sued for alleged discriminatory hiring practices favoring Asians, prompting a flurry of debate on whether TSMC’s
US president-elect Donald Trump is inheriting from President Joe Biden a challenging situation for American policy in the Indo-Pacific region, with an expansionist China on the march and threatening to incorporate Taiwan, by force if necessary. US policy choices have become increasingly difficult, in part because Biden’s policy of engagement with China, including investing in personal diplomacy with President Xi Jinping (習近平), has not only yielded little but also allowed the Chinese military to gain a stronger footing in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. In Xi’s Nov. 16 Lima meeting with a diminished Biden, the Chinese strongman signaled little
RSS