Many heads of conglomerates have been clamoring of late for the early establishment of direct transport, trade and postal links with China. This, they argue, is in the interests of the economy and of the welfare of the people. More often than not, however, they are merely pursuing their own interests by portraying them as the interests of the people.
In the opinion of Kao Ching-yuan (
I have some questions about this. Who stands to benefit from lower business costs? Do they benefit a company's employees, national security or the local community?
Even the most basic English-language management textbooks will tell you that the boss is not the only interested party in a company. There are also the workers, consumers, suppliers, financial institutions, the media, community groups and the government. They are all interested parties.
Taiwan's corporate management class now only cares about one thing, however -- profits. The interests of the other parties must therefore be equated with the company's interests by the argument that, if the company makes money, everyone will benefit. Hence the logic: "With-out direct links, businesses will lose their competitiveness and everyone will have to live miserable lives in the future."
This logic equates the voices of all other interested parties with the opinions of managers, and thereby with the opinions of corporate shareholders. Every day, we see business profit and loss reports in the newspapers. If a company profits, that means business is stable. If it suffers losses, its share price goes down. Amid the vagaries of that mechanism, the people's interests are narrowly interpreted as financial benefits.
So when we see news that Tainan Spinning Co's (台南紡織) Vietnam factory is making healthy profits and the company's share price is rising, we don't bother to consider whether such profits actually benefit all interested parties.
According to my information, the factory in question has badly violated the overtime work provisions of Vietnam's labor law by requiring employees to work every day -- without even a single day off -- for an entire month.
What's more, the workers never received double pay as required by the regulations for work carried out on holidays.
Not only that, but when the company calculates overtime pay, it rounds off the figures to the nearest thousand dong less, stealing the "change" from each employee's paycheck.
Under such circumstances, can company profits be equated with the interests of the Taiwan-ese people? Will Taiwan's image as a country that respects human rights receive a boost from Uni-President's profitability?
In the media reports, the voice of the other interested parties are reduced to "good profit margins and strong share prices."
A similar logic is also being applied to the demands that the government authorize private groups to negotiate direct links with Beijing. But how about national security and labor interests? Why should we let these business people negotiate matters that involve the interests of the entire people? The masters of industry have had their say.
What we need now are the voices of other parties -- not private interests spun as the interests of the people.
Wang Hong-zen is an assistant professor at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Francis Huang
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Starting this month, young women in Denmark would be subject to conscription on the same terms as men. All Danes, regardless of gender, would be required to register for military assessment, and eligible individuals would be selected through a lottery-based draft. In addition, service time would be increased to 11 months, and conscript numbers would grow to meet national defense targets. Denmark is not alone. In the past few years, several European countries, most notably Sweden and Norway, have adopted gender-neutral conscription systems. Latvia is moving in the same direction. The war in Ukraine has accelerated this trend. Faced with the
RSS