DURING THE 1980s when Ronald Reagan was president of the US, he was dubbed the "Teflon President" because no matter how bad the political or economic conditions got, he remained very popular. It was said he was like a Teflon frying pan, that nothing would stick to him. People young and old just liked him, for no apparent reason. In the 1990s, Bill Clinton succeeded Reagan with consistently high approval rates despite personal moral shortcomings.
Taiwan has a "Teflon Mayor," Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Some observers, especially his opponents, attribute Ma's success to his good looks. He is immensely popular with female and young voters. He is also quite personable and soft spoken, never engaging in shouting matches. It is difficult to carry on a fierce argument with Ma. In this sense, Ma is a different brand of politician. A well-mannered politician is a rare breed in Taiwan's political circles. These attributes and Ma's Teflon nature have created the false impression that his re-election as mayor of Taipei is inevitable.
In addition to his success as mayor of Taipei, Ma has rapidly become a heavyweight politician in his own party. He received the highest number of votes in the election for members of the KMT Central Committee. He is also thought of as a potential leader for the faltering KMT in future presidential elections. In a recent poll, more people said that Ma, rather than KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Because of Typhoon Nari's devastation, however, and the slowness and lack of coordination of the municipal government before and after the storm, Taipei citizens have become more critical of Ma. When he visited the disaster-hit districts of Taipei, residents no longer regarded him as free from blame. He received vocal complaints, being shouted at on many occasions. Suddenly, Ma has become part of the city government and not just a figurehead. His personal popularity is now closely connected with the performance of his team. Nari has finally removed his Teflon character.
It's hard to tell, however, whether Ma can recover from the damage done by Nari. Does this mean that Ma will be vulnerable in his re-election bid next year?
Not necessarily. Judging from the way he has so far handled this first major crisis of his administration, he might actually turn it into an opportunity. He did apologize for the incompetence of his administration. He also organized a reconstruction committee to review the causes of the damage brought by the typhoon so that proposals on the prevention of future disasters can be made. In other words, there is enough time for Ma to turn things around before the next election. By first claiming that the Taipei Rapid Transit System would not be normal for six months, Ma was shrewd enough to lower people's expectations of reconstruction. Now that some lines have been restored, Ma has accomplished the most important task in politics -- to exceed popular expectations. By doing so, he is likely to regain his popularity. But henceforward the sophisticated voters of Taipei will no longer separate Ma from his administrative team. No more Teflon mayor? Maybe.
Yen Chen-shen is a research fellow of the Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase