Once hailed as the ROC's "anti-communist patriots" for hijacking a Chinese passenger plane from China to South Korea in 1983, Zhuo Changren (
The six hijackers of the Chinese plane, with Zhuo as their leader, were detained, prosecuted, convicted and jailed in South Korea for a year and three months before being quietly sent to Taiwan in August of 1984. The Taiwan government went all out supporting them, even hiring defense attorneys for them in South Korea.
The ruckus over the Los Angeles Olympic Games provided the necessary smoke screen. Out of a worship of "anti-communist patriots," the colonial-style KMT regime which then governed Taiwan with an iron fist hailed them as "heros," rather than "hijackers."
The day after their arrival in Taiwan, they were received by then president Chiang Ching-kuo (
Ironically, as a result of such privileged treatment for their "patriotism," Zhuo and Jiang came to think only of themselves. They felt that Taiwan owed them, partly because, compared with Chinese pilots who directly defected to Taiwan in fighter jets, the reward money Zhuo and Jiang received was on the small side.
Coming from China's socialist "paradise," they were like helpless infants in Taiwan's capitalistic society. They had no concept of saving or investment and their money was quickly spent. After Zhuo lost all his money in investments, he decided to teamed up with Jiang to commit a kidnapping for ransom.
The two men's executions came after more than nine years of appeals against their sentences. While their executions were anticipated, they are nevertheless thought-provoking. One cannot help but ask what good has been accomplished from Taiwan's adherence to anti-communism and the price that has had to be paid for it. As a buttress of the KMT's ugly martial law regime, it wrecked many more lives than those of these two kidnappers. We can only hope that the execution of these two men means that the curtain has finally fallen on Taiwan's anti-communist farce.
After Zhuo and Jiang were sentenced to death, politics continued to meddle with criminal justice. Sung Hsin-lien (宋心濂), then chief of the National Security Bureau, visited them in detention. (Sung had been the first high-ranking intelligence official appointed by Chiang Ching-kuo to visit them in South Korea in 1983.) Sung instructed the Ministry of Justice to delay their execution. What an irony that after they received a death sentence, the prosecutor in the case Chu Chen-pei (邱鎮北) was arrested and convicted on corruption charges. One wonders how a corrupt prosecutor could have impartially dealt with such a highly political case. Later, a judge contacted another of the six hijackers to tell him that he had evidence to prove that Zhuo had been tortured by the prosecutor. The judge had hoped the man would come to Zhuo and Jiang's defense, but the request was rejected.
Nobody looks good in this case. Certainly the executed men were no angels. But politics and criminal justice became tangled up and anti-communist fever actually took priority over universally accepted values. The slogan used to be that that fighting against communism was no sin under any circumstances, a belief which was not only contemptibly vindictive but, as one might expect from the Chiang family, amazingly stupid, resulting as it did in Taiwan's isolation from the world community.
Zhuo and Jiang left the world on Friday. Let us hope that the anti-communist fervor that has caused so much grief in Taiwan went with them.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the