July 1 was the 80th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). For months there were rumors that President Jiang Zemin (
He did give an important speech, but it lacked any new theory. Indeed, there was not much theoretical innovation to be found at all. He did not propose any new content to his "original creation," the so-called "Three Represents" (三個代表), but only reiterated that the party repre-sents the development trend of China's advanced social productive forces, the orientation of China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming majority of people. His theory simply plagiarized Deng Xiaoping's (鄧小平) "Three Facings" (facing modernization, the world and the future), and Mao Zedong's (毛澤東) "nation-alist, scientific and of the masses" definition of new culture.
When discussing the education of new cadres, Jiang stressed the old "Four Transformations" (revolutionize, rejuvenate, educate and professionalize), showing that he lacks the capacity for theoretical innovation. Despite this, the editorial in the July 1 edition of the People's Daily still elevated his "Three Represents" to the level of "an important foundation, important political base and important source of power for the CCP," and it is already being discussed together with the other philosophies which guide the party -- Marxism-Leninism, Mao thought and Deng's theories.
Even though Jiang's speech was not much more than old platitudes and cliches, there is one part towards the end which is worth looking at. When discussing the criteria for attracting new party members, he raised eyebrows by proposing "the continued strengthening of the party's class foundation, the expansion of its popular base and the continued increase of its social influence, all in accordance with the realities of economic development and social advances." This was clearly aimed at the discussion about whether or not to admit private businessmen as members.
This question involves the nature of the Communist Party and Marxism-Leninism. Businessmen are typically of the capitalist class and the notion of allowing them into the party has no basis in theory, which is why the party's dogmatists and conservatives have always resisted their admission. In 1990, when conservatives held the upper hand, documents were issued ordering that businessmen should not be allowed to enter the party.
With the development of the market economy, however, many businessmen are coming forward with political demands, something that has begun to show inside the party lately, with reformists calling for ideological freedom. In March this year, Xing Benen (邢賁恩), deputy director of the Party School of the CCP Central Committee, said that "China now has a group of outstanding and highly able business people, and the time is ripe for the CCP to absorb them." The conservatives are attacking this view. Lin Yanzhi (林炎志), deputy secretary of the party committee in Jilin Province said in a secret report that the "new capitalist class" joining the party would change its character and wrest political power away from it.
Jiang's opinion on this issue amounts to a rejection of Lin. It also shows that the progressive forces created by economic development are gaining in influence inside the party. Jiang has been repeatedly swaying back and forth on the issue. In the early 1990s, he was actively opposed to admitting businessmen. Jiang's has merely shifted his position, but this does not signify true progression.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.