The move by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) to file criminal charges against the pilots involved in the recent Singapore air crash is a clear case of prosecutorial zeal run amok. The MOJ seems to be prone to that fault lately. As reported in the Taipei Times (Nov. 11, page 2), "despite objections from foreign and local pilots associations, the justice ministry is adamant that it is going to prosecute the pilots ..."
To do so is an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. Prosecutors, in most criminal justice systems, have some degree of discretion in choosing what incidents to investigate and what cases to file charges in, as well as what specific charges to file. The degree of prosecutorial discretion varies from one system to another. Taiwanese prosecutors do not have much discretionary latitude by law. They do however have enough that they could decline to file charges in cases like the Singapore crash.
As a former prosecutor in the US, I found some of the statements quoted in the article "interesting" in the negative sense of the term. Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
If the flight crews are subject to criminal liability then logic dictates that they tell the air safety investigators nothing. To use the American phrase, they "take the 5th." This greatly impedes the investigation which in turn has a very negative impact on air traffic safety. The goal of having safe air flight is a greater "good" than getting a single criminal prosecution. Ergo, from a public policy standpoint, the MOJ should decline criminal investigations or prosecutions in such cases as a general rule.
Prosecutions in such cases serve no policy ends. Civil servants, prosecutors among them, seem to constantly forget that their goal is not just follow the rules, but rather to follow the public policy behind the rules. That is to say the reason for the rules. To prosecute the aircrew in this case would not serve the broader goal of air safety. As one American investigator was quoted as saying; "Taiwan would be considered as remaining in the Stone Age if prosecutors really took such action."
The comment by the Taoyuan prosecutors' office, if not quoted out of context, was inane. They are quoted as saying "Whoever commits a crime in our territory is liable under our criminal law as long as Taiwan is a sovereign state. It is humiliating to the nation and inimical to its sovereignty not to handle the case in accordance with the law."
One can almost hear the shrillness in that comment. It appears to be a case of what "pop psychology" calls the Napoleon complex. That is the situation where a small person, small in whatever sense, who has an inferiority complex, again in whatever sense, goes about loudly and shrilly proclaiming that the entire world is trying to step on him. There have been numerous reported cases of the Napoleon complex in Taiwan. It seems to have stricken the Taoyuan prosecutors office.
As with Chen's comment, the Taoyuan prosecutor's comment misses the point. Deciding whether to prosecute or not has nothing to do with national sovereignty. It has everything to do with making a reasoned decision based on clear public policy considerations. In this case the prosecution should defer to the larger public policy concern of finding the causes of airline crashes which in turn can be used to make improvements in the air traffic system. That in turn leads to safer air travel for all.
It is my general policy to not criticize unless I can offer a concrete solution. In this case my solution is simple; don't prosecute the pilots and buy muzzles for prosecutors who can't talk reason in the media.
Brian Kennedy is an attorney who writes and teaches on criminal justice and human rights issues.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS