The Legislative Yuan shamed Taiwan again yesterday by electing Lo Fu-chu (羅福助), the self-confessed "spiritual leader" of Taiwan's biggest crime syndicate, as convener of its Judiciary Committee. Not to be outdone, Gary Wang (王令麟), out on bail until Wednesday following the Taiwan Development (台開) probe in which he has been charged with forgery and breach of trust, got himself elected convener of the Finance Committee.
It was not the first time Lo and Wang have been elected to these committees. But yesterday's election of the legislature's committee conveners was the first since the new government came to office. Obviously, the transition of political power has had no effect whatsoever on the deplorable nature of the legislature, which often seems little more than a sanctuary for brigands masquerading as a parliament.
The recent crackdown on "black gold" has made some lawmakers feel unsafe, even behind the shield of their constitutionally guaranteed immunity from prosecution. As a result, they have sought influence in legislative committees through which, utilizing the committees' power to review budgets and regulations of specific government agencies, they can exert pressure to be left alone to get on with their criminal activities.
It might be argued in the legislature's defense that since neither Lo nor Wang have been convicted of any wrongdoing, they are perfectly entitled to stand as candidates in the elections for convener. But the law is only a minimal ethical standard. We should demand standards far higher from elected representatives, recipients of the people's trust. Yesterday's absurdities could not have happened if our legislators, some of whom perhaps are actually law-abiding, had been capable of feeling and acting upon a sense of shame over their colleagues being implicated in criminal cases, or if they had been the least bit sensitive to public opinion. This was not to be, and Taiwan can only be the worse for it.
If this thunderhead has any silver lining at all it might be in the DPP caucus's successfully talking their colleague Chen Sheng-hung (陳勝宏) -- who also has a case pending against him -- out of running for the position of convener of the Judiciary Committee, and replacing him with Lee Ching-hsiung (李慶雄). Perhaps this successful screening by the DPP may prevent the legislature's reputation from hitting rock bottom.
The legislature is rotten to the core; who or what is to blame?
First of all, we could blame the multiple-member district electoral system, which allows questionable politicians to nudge their way into the legislature by controlling small groups of voters. We could also blame the "legislator at large" (不分區立委) system, whereby tycoons can get themselves nominated as legislators -- rather than having to win an election -- by funding the election campaigns of a few party favorites. We can also blame political parties that nominated "black gold" politicians as candidates in legislative elections. The KMT has begun to pay for its sins with the loss of central government power, but this process has far to go.
But we must also blame the electorate, for lacking the courage to resist vote-buying and social pressure, and for selling their country for a measly couple of thousand dollars each. We must also blame the government for not cracking down on "black gold" earlier and for not being more efficient in their crackdown.
The lamentable results of yesterday's elections have made one thing clear: the foundation of political reform lies in the reform of the legislature, which in turn depends on a commitment throughout society to clean itself up. Next year's legislative elections will allow us to pass judgement on this rotten legislature, but they will also allow the outside world to pass judgment on what kind of a society we want to build. Let us hope that judgment is not adverse.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS