Tsao Shou-min (
The bureau, by rashly declaring the ban, failed to meet the motto of Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's
Many bus riders are in the habit of eating their breakfast during their morning commute. In an effort to change this habit, the bureau has run educational commercials on TV and in movie theaters. But efforts to "persuade" the public have failed because of the lack of regulations and fines. That is why the bureau proposed the ban.
As far as the management of the bus companies are concerned, food and drinks brought on by passengers are the main sources of garbage and grime in the buses. A ban would get rid of potential trash, facilitate vehicle management and lower garbage disposal expenses.
However, while there may be a link between passengers eating and drinking on buses and the spillage of food and drinks on bus seats and floors, the one does not necessarily lead to the other.
Whoever is guilty of spilling food or drink is liable for punishment from the Bureau of Environmental Protection
Though eating and drinking on a bus might look disgraceful in the eyes of some people, it remains a personal right until the Legislative Yuan enacts a law banning the practice.
Until that time, the government has no right to enforce such a ban.
The next big question is who should be in charge of enforcing such a ban if it were to become law.
The MRT's ban on food and drinks is enforced by the MRT own staff and police force. Many passengers are accustomed to eating and drinking while riding and bus drivers will not be in a position to enforce such ban or even report cases. Besides dirty looks and negative comments from other passengers, there has to be someone responsible.
The question of who that will be still awaits a decision and regulations from the Transportation Bureau. Until then the garbage problem on buses can not be properly resolved.
Lin Shu-hui is a reporter at the Taipei City desk of the Liberty Times.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
RSS