The 228 Incident occurred without warning in 1947, but its effects spread quickly throughout all of Taiwan within four days. Three months later Ko Yuan-fen (
The incident was a taboo subject for 40 years, until Chen Yung-hsing (
However, the government claimed that the 228 Incident was caused by the "alienation" between officials and public and "cultural" and "language" differences. If this were true, however, then the 228 Incident should have first occurred in some other country, instead of Taiwan.
Taiwan was placed under Chinese control at the end of WWII, as per the order of the Allied Command. Battered and desperate from the war, Taiwan-ese clung to the idea that they were returning to a democratic China -- their "motherland." They thought they would be allowed to serve in all levels of the government, and educated youth entertained dreams contributing to the building of a new China.
Chen Yi
Society was further racked by KMT factional struggles, increasingly turning Taiwan into a lawless society. The appearance and discipline of the KMT army stationed in Taiwan was also appalling, and soldiers frequently bullied and stole from the people. The police carried out random searches and ran smuggling operations. Life was becoming increasingly difficult for regular people, while officials prospered.
The public soon knew all about official corruption and the ineptitude of the KMT regime under Chen Yi , but their previous belief in government propaganda tempered their anger and toned down their demands. In the end, Taiwanese only asked for equality and the chance to increase their standard of living.
The government ignored all of their political and economic proposals, however, and prohibited Taiwanese from working in the government on the basis that they "lacked democratic traditions and language competence." The Taiwanese then "stupidly waited" and threw themselves into learning Mandarin Chinese.
By November 1946, just two months after the Constitutional Assembly started its sessions, Chen revealed the so-called "Three Year Plan for Self-Governance," whereby direct elections for county commissioners and mayors would be put off until 1947, two years later than similar elections in mainland China.
The government also continued to hold "civic training" courses for residents in Taiwan. In addition to language classes, the courses also included content from the "New Life Movement," which had been promoted in mainland China 13 years previously.
People were forced to submit to norms of "propriety, justice, honesty and righteousness" while suffering the rule of corrupt and tyrannical officials.
The normally meek Taiwanese began to get angry. They started to view each of Chen's policies as a direct affront, and stopped cooperating with the govern-ment.
However, a grain shortage at the time diverted the people's attention to the grain dealers rather than the government, however, making the 228 Incident all that much more unexpected.
Chen announced that Taiwan was part of China again, yet Taiwan's legal status remained undecided as the ROC-Japan Peace Treaty had not yet been signed. Taiwan remained outside of the legal jurisdiction of China's constitution for a full year after Chen announced Taiwan's return to China.
According to the guidelines of the Pacific Charter and UN Charter, Taiwan met the requirements for national autonomy at the time, and the ROC government was most concerned over the attitude of people in Taiwan before the Cairo Declaration was signed. They were afraid that the people of Taiwan would reject China and walk away with Taiwan in the ROC-Japan Peace Treaty.
Although Chen declared Taiwan had returned to China, he acted contrarily by attempting to isolate and prevent the Taiwanese from participating in the government and the economy until the treaty was signed.
The ROC was forced to pospone the introduction of Taiwanese into the government as Taiwan's status was yet undecided. Chen refused to tell the truth and used excuses to deceive the people of Taiwan. The people thus lost their faith in the government.
The hostility between the government and people was the true cause of the 228 Incident.
Hsieh Chang-chang is a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS