The severe damage caused by the 921 earthquake has pushed the people of Taiwan into a period of self-reflection and spiritual rehabilitation. We all hope relief and reconstruction work will be completed as soon as possible, so people can get back on track with their everyday lives. Rebuilding a homeland is like a "revolution of hope."
The question is: What mechanism does Taiwan have to trigger a change of values? In other words: Where does the strength come from to motivate this change in perspective needed in the wake of the disaster?
This strength should prevent the reconstruction process from falling into a vicious cycle of "the good pushes out the bad."
Though the impact of the earthquake was tremendous, we have noticed as time passes that Taiwan's political and financial structures remain fairly intact.
At such a time, it is difficult to find the energy to revitalize society, but various organizations involved in post-quake work have won the hearts and respect of the people.
Relief work undertaken by non-profit organizations, which mobilized thousands of volunteers immediately, was unprecedented in the history of Taiwan.
A non-profit organization, the Civilian Post-disaster Reconstruction Coordination Alliance (
Its mandate, to unify the power of more than one hundred non-profit institutions engaged in post-quake work, is considered a historic undertaking.
There has never been an apolitical alliance of such an immense scale in Taiwan.
As for how to reconstruct social values, if the alliance can play the role of an initiator, energized by the participation of non-profit organizations, new values within society are likely to be established during the reconstruction process.
Due to various reasons, the alliance was able to harness the most aggressive reform forces in Taiwan.
Lee Yuan-tseh, chairman of the alliance and Academia Sinica president, called upon all departments in the government to discharge their duties to the best of their abilities.
Non-governmental organizations cannot be absent from the planning and monitoring process of reconstruction, but this does not mean these organizations can replace the role the government should be performing.
It is to be regretted, however, that on several occasions, the government responded unprofessionally when challenged by the alliance over the efficiency of its work.
The reaction was predictable because governmental officials are used to maintaining good relationships with only those non-governmental organizations close to the government. If the government is open-minded enough, the Alliance can share with the government the heavy responsibilities of reconstruction.
It is unfair to challenge the credibility of the alliance. There is no harm in the government considering the alliance as an equal partner with which to produce a reconstruction solution most beneficial to the country.
Although the 921 earthquake did a lot of damage to our country, it also provided us with a pivotal point for introducing reform. In the process of reconstruction, it would be worthwhile for the entire nation to overhaul its social fabric.
If non-profit organizations can also play the role of decision-makers in government policy, that would be the best contribution to society.
If reconstruction efforts can trigger a new era of social reform to the benefit of all Taiwanese people, then this, perhaps more than anything, would be the most meaningful commemoration for the victims of the quake.
Ku Chung-hwa is Chairman of the Department of Sociology at National Chengchi University
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within