The music, film and entertainment industries were celebrating a rare victory over Internet copyright pirates on Thursday after a Swedish court handed down prison sentences and hefty fines to four men behind the world’s most notorious filesharing Web site.
In what is being described as a landmark verdict, the quartet in charge of The Pirate Bay (TPB) — which offers thousands of movies, TV shows and tracks of music for download — were found guilty of helping to illegally distribute copyrighted material and sentenced to a year in prison and fines totaling US$3.5 million.
The ruling by a judge in Stockholm marks the culmination of a two-year case brought by a consortium of media and entertainment companies, led by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI).
PHOTO: REUTERS
“This is good news for everyone — in Sweden and internationally — who is making a living or a business from creative activity and who needs to know their rights will protected by law,” IFPI chairman John Kennedy said. “It would have been very difficult to put on a brave face if we had lost, but this verdict sends a strong educational and deterrent message.”
The defendants, who have cultivated an image of rebellious outsiders, reacted acidly to the news, however, calling the verdict “bullshit,” promising to appeal and signaling that they would not shut the site down.
“Nothing will happen to TPB, us personally or filesharing whatsoever,” said Peter Sunde Kolmisoppi, one of the site’s founders, on Twitter. “This is just a theater for the media.”
Since it first launched in 2003, The Pirate Bay has become the poster child for illegal downloading, used by millions of people to get copies of the latest movies, TV shows and music releases.
Although the site had been raided by police several times, its creators argued that they were not acting illegally under Sweden’s interpretation of copyright law.
They also taunted the authorities by promoting high-profile downloads of new Hollywood films and responding to legal threats by posting insults online.
In one exchange with DreamWorks — the film studio behind hits including Gladiator and Shrek — The Pirate Bay lashed out with verbal abuse and accusations of US imperialism.
“Sweden is not a state in the United States of America ... US law does not apply here,” they said. “It is the opinion of us and our lawyers that you are morons and that you should sodomize yourself with retractable batons.”
Lawyers representing the four men had maintained that The Pirate Bay was essentially no different from Google, merely acting as a search engine of online content.
It does not host pirated files itself, but tracks the location of copyrighted files and provides links to chunks of material known as torrents hosted elsewhere. As such, it does not directly infringe copyright, their lawyers said.
That contention was partially successful, with prosecutors forced to drop half of their charges against the men early in the trial.
However, the quartet’s championing of piracy and their antagonistic attitude counted against them as the court found them guilty on 33 counts of making files accessible for illegal sharing and ordered that compensation be divided between a consortium including Sony BMG, Universal, MGM and 20th Century Fox.
Three of the men found guilty yesterday — Kolmisoppi, Fredrik Neij and Gottfrid Svartholm Warg — were involved in the day-to-day operation of the Web site. The fourth, Carl Lundstrom, a Swedish food magnate turned extreme rightwing politician, provided funds that helped keep it running.
Industry experts warned that the victory is unlikely to have much impact on filesharing, with millions of people continuing to use The Pirate Bay and other services to download files illegally.
Mark Mulligan, a digital music analyst and vice-president of research at Forrester Research, said the result was a fillip for the entertainment business, but that its effect would be temporary at best.
“It’s important for the industry and they have to do it or they’re giving filesharing the go-ahead, but they’re not going to create a significant downturn in traffic,” he told reporters. “In the past where they could have a substantive effect on an illegal service, all it did was push the proliferation of alternatives.”
The decision further exposed the growing rift between the creative industries and technologically savvy members of the public, as artists widely welcomed the decision but thousands of Web users derided the court’s judgment and said they would continue downloading.
Talking after the verdict, Kolmisoppi insisted he was “OK” and vowed to appeal the case.
“We lost, but in the next level we will win,” he said. “Maybe we’re playing with matches, but I think it’s more fair when one person decides the outcome.”
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to
RSS