The government should take a more active role in regulating outbound foreign direct investment (FDI), especially as geopolitical tensions make advanced technology strategically sensitive, experts said on Tuesday.
At a conference on strategic resilience in Taipei, Lee Wen-chieh (李文傑), an economics associate professor at National Chengchi University, said Taiwan’s “dual-track” policy — strict controls on investment in China, but comparatively loose rules elsewhere — has been “insufficient to cope with increasing external risks.”
While the government maintains tight oversight of China-bound investment, overseas expansion in other markets is largely left to companies themselves, Lee said.
Photo: Liao Chia-ning, Taipei Times
“We barely have a designated agency regulating outbound investments outside China,” he said.
Citing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) recent global expansion, Lee said the lack of government representation in its talks with foreign governments put the Taiwanese company in a weaker negotiating position.
He cited TSMC’s announced additional US$100 billion investment in the US in early March, saying that “all the Ministry of Economic Affairs did was deny any involvement three days later while saying TSMC made the decision.”
Taiwan’s outbound investment rules are outdated and lack a clear legal basis, lawyer Chen Yen-po (陳言博) said.
The ministry has not updated the regulations to reflect amendments made to the Industrial Innovation Statute (產業創新發展條例) in April, he said.
Only TSMC’s Nanjing, China, fab is covered by specific restrictions under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), Chen said.
Its other overseas investments remain largely outside any regulatory framework, he said, urging the government to introduce comprehensive oversight rather than leaving such decisions to companies.
Taiwan should look to how other major economies have strengthened their oversight systems, Lee said, citing the US’ CHIPS and Science Act enacted in 2022 and the Reverse CFIUS mechanism created last year, as well as Japan’s Economic Security Promotion Act approved in 2022.
By contrast, the Department of Investment Review is operating under an “outdated and reactive regulatory structure,” he said.
Lee suggested establishing a cross-ministerial FDI oversight mechanism to balance national security with corporate autonomy.
A stronger government role would allow negotiations to be conducted “government-to-government,” enabling Taiwan to leverage foreign industrial policies, tariffs and trade arrangements, he added.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
Taiwan’s long-term economic competitiveness will hinge not only on national champions like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) but also on the widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies, a US-based scholar has said. At a lecture in Taipei on Tuesday, Jeffrey Ding, assistant professor of political science at the George Washington University and author of "Technology and the Rise of Great Powers," argued that historical experience shows that general-purpose technologies (GPTs) — such as electricity, computers and now AI — shape long-term economic advantages through their diffusion across the broader economy. "What really matters is not who pioneers
BUBBLE? Only a handful of companies are seeing rapid revenue growth and higher valuations, and it is not enough to call the AI trend a transformation, an analyst said Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering a more challenging phase next year as companies move beyond experimentation and begin demanding clear financial returns from a technology that has delivered big gains to only a small group of early adopters, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Taiwan said yesterday. Most organizations have been able to justify AI investments through cost recovery or modest efficiency gains, but few have achieved meaningful revenue growth or long-term competitive advantage, the consultancy said in its 2026 AI Business Predictions report. This growing performance gap is forcing executives to reconsider how AI is deployed across their organizations, it said. “Many companies
COST PRESSURE: Global PC brands such as HP Inc are expected to cope with the situation by either raising prices or downgrading their products, a researcher said Global PC shipments are expected to grow by a mere 0.3 percent to about 180 million units next year, as a surge in memory prices has added cost pressure on manufacturers, the Market Intelligence and Consulting Institute (MIC) said at a news conference in Taipei yesterday. As major memorychip suppliers such as Samsung Electronics Co and Micron Technology Inc shift resources and production capacity toward high-bandwidth memory, which is used primarily in servers and offers higher margins, the supply of low-power DRAM used in PCs and smartphones has been squeezed, tightening supply-demand conditions and pushing up prices, MIC ICT Industry Research
RSS