The Indian military for decades has been talking about a two-front war with neighbors Pakistan and China to keep politicians focused on defense spending. Now that scenario is looking ever more realistic, with conflicts flaring on both its disputed borders.
Talks last week between top Chinese and Indian army commanders in the Ladakh region ended without a major breakthrough, the second such attempt to cool tensions since 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese troops were killed on June 15 in their worst clash in four decades.
At about the same time, weapons and explosives were recovered and two suspected terrorists were killed after a 15-hour gunbattle about 660km away in south Kashmir, officials said.
India has fought four wars with China and Pakistan since it in 1947 gained freedom from British rule, but it has never had to defend both borders at the same time.
Indian military officials are growing concerned that China and Pakistan might gang up on New Delhi at a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is faced with surging COVID-19 infections.
Modi on Friday made a surprise visit to Indian Army headquarters in Leh, capital of the Ladakh region, where he was briefed on the nine-week face-off with China.
“New Delhi is clearly under great pressure, whether from COVID-19, along the Line of Control in Kashmir, or from China,” said Ian Hall, professor of international relations at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia, and author of Modi and the Reinvention of Indian Foreign Policy.
“We have seen relations with both Islamabad and Beijing worsen over the past few years, and the result is that both have decided to escalate things during the pandemic, when the Modi government is stretched and distracted,” Hall said.
The Indian military is huge and contingencies are always kept in mind, said a senior security official who was not authorized to speak to the press.
Despite the planning, the need to commit resources to two fronts at the same time would stretch the armed forces.
India’s army chief has warned of this eventuality, urging the government — including its diplomatic corps — to be prepared to step in to avoid it.
“As far as two front war is concerned it is a possibility,” General Manoj Mukund Naravane, India’s Chief of Army Staff, said in May. “A country does not go to war with its armed forces alone. It has other pillars like diplomatic corps and other organs of government, which will come into play to make sure that we are not forced into a corner where we will have to deal with two adversaries at the same time and in full strength.”
Indian and Chinese troops remain deployed eyeball-to-eyeball along the country’s northern boundary, the unmarked and contested Line of Actual Control (LAC), where tensions in early May rose. Both sides have amassed thousands of soldiers, artillery guns and tanks at multiple locations.
The army on Wednesday last week said that more diplomatic and military talks were planned “to ensure peace and tranquility” after military-level negotiations ended without a clear outcome.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian (趙立堅) on Friday last week told reporters in a regular briefing in Beijing that politicians in India had “continuously made irresponsible remarks that damage Sino-Indian relations.”
Referring to New Delhi’s moves that seek to restrict Chinese imports and ownership of Indian companies, Zhao said: “Setting up obstacles for the cooperation between the two countries violates the relevant WTO rules and will also harm India’s own interests. China will take necessary measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises in India.”
At the same time, India’s 742km Line of Control with Pakistan has become equally active and tense. Indian soldiers have faced regular cross-border firing and engaged in counter-terror operations in the hinterland.
India’s army said it killed 127 “terrorists” in the first six months of the year, about 30 percent more than a year earlier, said a senior security official who asked not to be identified, citing rules for speaking with reporters.
The incidents of cross-border firing that the Indian military has recorded also doubled this year compared with last year, the official said.
The Pakistani Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a statement on Wednesday last week blamed India for more than 1,500 “ceasefire violations,” including deaths and injuries of civilians on their side of the Kashmir frontier this year.
Some military formations, which normally move to Jammu & Kashmir to bolster the counter-insurgency operations along the Pakistan border in the summer months, have moved to the India-China border.
“The Indian Army is a well-led, professional force organized, equipped, trained, experienced and motivated to take on any commitments that it may be called for, be it internal or external,” Indian Army spokesperson Colonel Aman Anand said in response to questions.
Collusion between Pakistan and China to keep India’s western and northern borders on simmer at the same time is difficult to prove, but cannot be ruled out, said Vipin Narang, associate professor of political science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and author of Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict.
“But my general sense is that Pakistan may feel like it needs to show resolve at home and to India in Jammu & Kashmir” after India in August last year changed the province’s constitutional status, Narang said. Islamabad might “also be opportunistically taking advantage of India’s distraction and focus on the LAC.”
The clash with “China is obviously a major embarrassment for India. What are India’s choices? It can’t attack China and throw them out and they know it,” said Mahmud Durrani, a retired lieutenant general and national security adviser in Pakistan.
“The fallout of that can be that to prove their strength and muscles, they are going to do something with Pakistan — the smaller partner of China. They will do something to prove to its people that ‘we are still strong,” he added.
Durrani said that a “connection between the strategic movements between China and Pakistan” could also “be a possibility.”
Whichever way it plays out, “it could be a very tense and bloody summer for India on both of its disputed borders,” Narang said.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
RSS