The credibility of climate pledges by the world’s tech giants to rapidly become carbon neutral is fading fast as they devour more and more energy in the race to develop artificial intelligence (AI) and build data centers, researchers warned on Thursday.
Apple, Google and Meta said they would stop adding carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by 2030, while Amazon set that target for 2040. Microsoft promised to be “net negative” — pulling carbon dioxide out of the air — by the end of this decade.
However, those vows, made before the AI boom transformed the sector, are starting to look like a fantasy, even as these companies have doubled down on them, according to independent analysts.
Photo: Bloomberg
“The greenhouse gas emissions targets of tech companies appear to have lost their meaning,” said Thomas Day, lead author of a report by think tanks Carbon Market Watch and NewClimate Institute.
“If energy consumption continues to rise unchecked and without adequate oversight, these targets will likely be unachievable,” he added.
The deep-dive analysis found the overall integrity of the climate strategies at Meta, Microsoft and Amazon to be “poor,” while Apple’s and Microsoft’s were deemed “moderate.”
When it came to the quality of emissions reduction targets, those of Meta and Amazon were judged “very poor,” while Google and Microsoft scored a “poor” rating. Only Apple fared better.
The expanding carbon footprint of the five top tech behemoths stems mostly from the breakneck expansion of AI, which requires huge amounts of energy to develop and run.
Electricity consumption — and the carbon emissions that come with it — has doubled for some of these companies in the last three or four years, and tripled for others, the report found.
The same is true across the sector: Operational emissions of the world’s top 200 information technology companies were nearly 300 million tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2023, and nearly five times that if the downstream use products and services are taken into account, according to the UN’s International Telecommunications Union.
If the sector were a country, it would rank fifth in greenhouse gas emissions, ahead of Brazil. Electricity to power data centers increased on average 12 percent per year from 2017 to last year, and is projected to double by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency.
If all this extra power came from solar and wind, carbon dioxide emissions would not be rising. However, despite ambitious plans to source their energy from renewables, much of it is still not carbon neutral. Studies estimate that half of the computing capacity of tech companies’ data centers comes from subcontractors, yet many companies do not account for these emissions, the study said.
The same is true for the entire infrastructure and equipment supply chain, which accounts for at least one-third of tech companies’ carbon footprint.
“There is a lot of investment in renewable energy, but overall, it has not offset the sector’s thirst for electricity,” Day said.
Given the status of AI as a driver of economic growth, and even as a vector for industrial policy, it is unlikely that governments are going to constrain the sector’s expansion, the report said.
“So far the whole AI boom has been altogether quite unregulated,” Day said.
“There are things these companies can and will do for future proofing, to make sure they’re moving in the right direction” in relation to climate goals, he added. “But when it comes to decisions that would essentially constrain the growth of the business model, we don’t see any indications that that can happen without regulatory action.”
The report identified a number of ways in which the tech sector could curb its carbon footprint, even as it develops AI apace. Ensuring that data centers — both those belonging to the companies as well as third party partners — run on renewable electricity is crucial.
Increasing the lifespan of devices and expanding the use of recycled components for hardware production could also make a big difference.
Finally, the methods used for calculating emissions reduction targets are out of date and in need of revision, the report said.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) secured a record 70.2 percent share of the global foundry business in the second quarter, up from 67.6 percent the previous quarter, and continued widening its lead over second-placed Samsung Electronics Co, TrendForce Corp (集邦科技) said on Monday. TSMC posted US$30.24 billion in sales in the April-to-June period, up 18.5 percent from the previous quarter, driven by major smartphone customers entering their ramp-up cycle and robust demand for artificial intelligence chips, laptops and PCs, which boosted wafer shipments and average selling prices, TrendForce said in a report. Samsung’s sales also grew in the second quarter, up
LIMITED IMPACT: Investor confidence was likely sustained by its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as only less advanced chips are made in Nanjing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) saw its stock price close steady yesterday in a sign that the loss of the validated end user (VEU) status for its Nanjing, China, fab should have a mild impact on the world’s biggest contract chipmaker financially and technologically. Media reports about the waiver loss sent TSMC down 1.29 percent during the early trading session yesterday, but the stock soon regained strength and ended at NT$1,160, unchanged from Tuesday. Investors’ confidence in TSMC was likely built on its relatively small exposure to the Chinese market, as Chinese customers contributed about 9 percent to TSMC’s revenue last
LOOPHOLES: The move is to end a break that was aiding foreign producers without any similar benefit for US manufacturers, the US Department of Commerce said US President Donald Trump’s administration would make it harder for Samsung Electronics Co and SK Hynix Inc to ship critical equipment to their chipmaking operations in China, dealing a potential blow to the companies’ production in the world’s largest semiconductor market. The US Department of Commerce in a notice published on Friday said that it was revoking waivers for Samsung and SK Hynix to use US technologies in their Chinese operations. The companies had been operating in China under regulations that allow them to import chipmaking equipment without applying for a new license each time. The move would revise what is known
UNCERTAINTY: A final ruling against the president’s tariffs would upend his trade deals and force the government to content with billions of dollars in refunds The legal fight over US President Donald Trump’s global tariffs is deepening after a federal appeals court ruled the levies were issued illegally under an emergency law, extending the chaos in global trade. A 7-4 decision by a panel of judges on Friday was a major setback for Trump, even as it gives both sides something to boast about. The majority upheld a May ruling by the Court of International Trade that the tariffs were illegal. However, the judges left the levies intact while the case proceeds, as Trump had requested, and suggested that any injunction could potentially be narrowed to apply