Volkswagen AG has sued Indian authorities to quash an “impossibly enormous” tax demand of US$1.4 billion, arguing the ask is contradictory to New Delhi’s import taxation rules for car parts and would hamper the company’s business plans, court papers show.
Volkswagen’s unit, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd, also told the High Court in Mumbai the tax dispute puts at risk its investments of US$1.5 billion in India, and is detrimental to the foreign investment climate, according to the 105-page filing which is not public, but was reviewed by Reuters.
In the biggest ever import tax demand, India in September last year slapped a US$1.4 billion tax notice on Volkswagen for using a strategy to break down imports of some Volkswagen, Skoda and Audi cars into many individual parts to pay a lower duty.
Photo: REUTERS
Indian authorities alleged Volkswagen imported “almost the entire” car unassembled — which attracts a 30 percent to 35 percent tax applicable on completely knocked down units (CKD), but evaded the levies by misclassifying them as “individual parts” coming in separate shipments, paying just a 5 percent to 15 percent levy.
Volkswagen India had kept the Indian government informed of its “part-by-part import” model and received clarifications in its support in 2011, the company said in the court challenge.
The tax notice is “in complete contradiction of the position held by the government ... [and] places at peril the very foundation of faith and trust that foreign investors would desire to have in the actions and assurances” of the administration, the Jan. 29 court filing states.
The German car manufacturer is a tiny player in India’s 4-million-units-a-year car market, the world’s third largest, where its Audi brand also lags behind competitors in the luxury segment such as Mercedes AG and BMW AG.
A government source earlier told Reuters that with penalties, Volkswagen India might have to pay about US$2.8 billion if it loses the dispute. From 2023 to last year, Volkswagen India reported sales of US$2.19 billion and a net profit of US$11 million.
Volkswagen argues it is not liable to pay higher taxes as it did not import car parts together as a single “kit,” but instead shipped them separately, combining them with some local components to make a car.
To explain what a “kit” is, it refers to a “practical analogy” of buying a chair online from Amazon.com Inc, which is then delivered in one shipment with all parts and fixtures needed to assemble the piece of furniture.
In the case, authorities alleged Volkswagen’s local unit regularly placed bulk orders for cars through internal software which connected it to suppliers in Czech Republic, Germany, Mexico and other nations.
And after the order was placed, the software broke it down into “main components/parts,” roughly 700 to 1,500 for each vehicle depending on the model, which were shipped separately over time.
This was “a ploy to clear the goods without the payment of the applicable duty,” Indian authorities said.
“There is no exclusive utilization of the parts towards manufacture of one specific car,” the company said in the court filing.
Volkswagen India also contests the alleged clandestine software use by arguing it only helps dealers convey car orders so that it could track “consumer demand at a macro level.”
The tax notice “deals a body blow” to the much-advertised “policy of ease of doing business in India for foreign investors,” the company said.
The High Court in Mumbai is due to start hearing the case on Wednesday.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday held its first board of directors meeting in the US, at which it did not unveil any new US investments despite mounting tariff threats from US President Donald Trump. Trump has threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan-made chips, prompting market speculation that TSMC might consider boosting its chip capacity in the US or ramping up production of advanced chips such as those using a 2-nanometer technology process at its Arizona fabs ahead of schedule. Speculation also swirled that the chipmaker might consider building its own advanced packaging capacity in the US as part
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would