Intel Corp chief financial officer Dave Zinsner said that a formal separation of the company’s factory and product development divisions is an open question that would be decided by the chipmaker’s next leader.
Zinsner, who is serving as interim co-CEO following this month’s ouster of Pat Gelsinger, made the remarks on Thursday at the Barclays technology conference in San Francisco alongside co-CEO Michelle Johnston Holthaus.
Intel’s struggles to keep pace with rivals — along with its deteriorating financial condition — have spurred speculation that the next CEO would make dramatic changes. That has included talk of a split of the company’s manufacturing and product design operations.
Photo: Reuters
“That’s an open question for another day,” Zinsner said in response to an analyst question.
The two units are already separated operationally, with different oversight and accounts, he said.
Gelsinger, who served as CEO from 2021 until last week, had maintained that the two main parts of the company were better kept together.
Johnston Holthaus said that access to leading production technology is an advantage for Intel’s products.
“So pragmatically, do I think it makes sense that they’re completely separated and there’s no ties?” she said. “I don’t think so, but someone will decide that.”
The shares gained 3.3 percent to US$20.78 in New York. They had plunged 60 percent through Wednesday’s close.
The executives broke with their predecessor’s more bullish messaging and emphasized that it would take time to fix Intel’s competitiveness and finances. They pointed to progress in personal computer chips, but also struggles ahead in data center products. Intel’s outsourced manufacturing effort, which involves making chips for outside clients, is another challenge.
Management would focus less on talking about “early indications of success” and more on concrete achievements, Zinsner said.
They also would dispense with giving “meaningless” long-term total deal value predictions for the company’s outsourced production efforts, he added.
Johnston Holthaus said that Intel needs to invest more in its products and is willing to deal with near-term down years to make sure it has offerings that would be more competitive in the long run.
Johnston Holthaus, known internally as “MJ,” also said that rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc has done a better job of providing their shared customers with data center products they want.
Next year, the executive would focus on trying to halt the market share loss that Intel has suffered, she said. As part of last week’s shake-up, Johnston Holthaus also took on the role of product CEO, putting her at the heart of that effort.
In artificial intelligence accelerator chips, where Nvidia Corp has taken a dominant role, Intel has struggled as well.
The company’s Gaudi chip is difficult to use, Johnston Holthaus acknowledged.
Intel is now focusing on more generic graphics chip offerings that would not be great at first, but would be rapidly updated to make them competitive, she said.
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
TikTok abounds with viral videos accusing prestigious brands of secretly manufacturing luxury goods in China so they can be sold at cut prices. However, while these “revelations” are spurious, behind them lurks a well-oiled machine for selling counterfeit goods that is making the most of the confusion surrounding trade tariffs. Chinese content creators who portray themselves as workers or subcontractors in the luxury goods business claim that Beijing has lifted confidentiality clauses on local subcontractors as a way to respond to the huge hike in customs duties imposed on China by US President Donald Trump. They say this Chinese decision, of which Agence