In 28 years in India’s pharmaceuticals sector, Rajiv Desai has never been busier.
Most of the last six months on his desk calendar is marked green, indicating visits to the 12 plants of Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc, India’s No. 2 drugmaker, where Desai is a senior quality control executive. Only one day is red — a day off.
That is what is needed these days to satisfy the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that standards are being met.
“In this sector, you’re only as good as your last inspection,” Desai said in his office in suburban Mumbai.
Often dubbed “the pharmacy of the world,” India is home to the most FDA-approved plants outside of the US and supplies about 40 percent of the US$70 billion worth of generic drugs sold in the country.
However, sanctions and bans have badly damaged India’s reputation and slowed growth in the US$16 billion sector. Drug exports fell in the fiscal year ending in March.
More than 40 plants have been banned by the FDA for issues ranging from data fraud to hygiene since India’s then-largest drugmaker Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd was pulled up for serious violations in 2008.
Drug companies have spent millions of dollars on training, new equipment and foreign consultants.
Yet the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance of the top 20 firms says its members still need at least five more years to get manufacturing standards and data reliability up to scratch.
The case of Lupin shows why.
The FDA is in the next few months expected to clear Lupin’s Goa plant, which supplies around a third of its US sales, of problems found in 2015, Desai said.
However, the agency also published a new notice just last week citing issues with data storage at its plant in Pithampur, central India.
If companies want to continue to sell into the world’s biggest health care market, they must keep constant vigilance.
“A lot of companies will struggle to meet the requirements that are the need of the day, and I would expect to see additional consolidation on the supply side,” Lupin chief executive officer Vinita Gupta told analysts last month.
India has its own standards body, the Central Drug Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), which maintains that its quality controls are stringent enough to ensure drugs are safe.
“India’s standards are different,” Indian Drug Controller General and head of CDSCO G.N. Singh said in an interview in his New Delhi office. “Indian companies are compliant with our manufacturing standards. We cannot regulate them according to the US standards.”
The FDA has taken matters into its own hands and gradually expanded in India to more than a dozen full-time staff.
Inspections are frequent and increasingly unannounced. If the agency finds problems, it issues a Form 483 — a notice outlining the violations — which, if not resolved, can lead to a “warning letter” and in worst case, a ban.
Violations range from hygiene problems, such as rat traps and dirty laboratories, to inadequate controls on systems that store data, leaving it open to tampering.
None of the violations the FDA has cited in India have explicitly said the drugs are unsafe and when companies are banned by the FDA, they can sell into other markets, including in the developing world, until the bans are lifted.
Industry watchers say Lupin, which specializes in oral contraceptives and drugs for diabetes and hypertension, is doing better than most, as so far, none of its infractions have extended to a ban.
On a recent visit by reporters to its Goa plant, blue-uniformed employees could be seen working on giant machines, then making notes in hardbound registers. These are being phased out as Lupin transitions to more secure e-files.
Employees are often videotaped to ensure they follow standard operating procedure. Manufacturers have cut back to focus on quality over quantity: Five years ago, Lupin was making 1 billion pills a month at one of its Goa plants — now it makes just 450 million.
Both the company and employees needed to be willing to acknowledge errors, as the first impulse in the past was often “don’t tell anyone,” Desai said.
As recently as three years ago, training was a “formality,” Desai said. Now, when an error is traced to an employee, the entire team undergoes fresh training.
The companies also have to be willing to spend big. Lachman Consultants, PwC and Boston Consulting Group conduct mock audits at the Goa plant every three to six months, at a cost of up to US$400 an hour.
The EU and US are nearing an agreement to coordinate on producing and securing critical minerals, part of a push to break reliance on Chinese supplies. The potential deal would create incentives, such as minimum prices, that could advantage non-Chinese suppliers, according to a draft of an “action plan” seen by Bloomberg. The EU and US would also cooperate on standards, investments and joint projects, as well as coordinate on any supply disruptions by countries like China. The two sides are additionally seeking other “like-minded partners” to join a multicountry accord to help create these new critical mineral supply chains, which feed into
For weeks now, the global tech industry has been waiting for a major artificial intelligence (AI) launch from DeepSeek (深度求索), seen as a benchmark for China’s progress in the fast-moving field. More than a year has passed since the start-up put Chinese AI on the map in early last year with a low-cost chatbot that performed at a similar level to US rivals. However, despite reports and rumors about its imminent release, DeepSeek’s next-generation “V4” model is nowhere in sight. Speculation is also swirling over the geopolitical implications of which computer chips were chosen to train and power the new
Elon Musk’s lieutenants have reached out to chip industry suppliers, including Applied Materials Inc, Tokyo Electron Ltd and Lam Research Corp, for his envisioned Terafab, early steps in an audacious and likely arduous attempt to break into the production of cutting-edge chips. Staff working for the joint venture between Tesla Inc and Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) have sought price quotes and delivery times for an array of chipmaking gear, people familiar with the matter said. In past weeks, they’ve contacted makers of photomasks, substrates, etchers, depositors, cleaning devices, testers and other tools, according to the people, who asked not to
Japan approved ¥631.5 billion (US$3.97 billion) in additional subsidies to hasten Rapidus Corp’s entry into the high-stakes artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaking arena, ramping up support for a project widely regarded as a long shot. The capital is intended to bankroll Rapidus’ work for information technology firm Fujitsu Ltd, one of the initial customers that Tokyo hopes would get the signature endeavor off the ground. The new money raises the fees and investments that the government is injecting into the start-up to ¥2.6 trillion by the end of the current fiscal year to March next year, the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and