US President Barack Obama is risking a revolt within his own party as he presses ahead on a free trade agreement (FTA) with South Korea, setting the stage for a showdown after November legislative elections.
Organized labor, a critical support base for Obama’s Democratic Party, and several Democrats have already vowed to fight the deal which they say would hurt workers.
“To try and advance the Korean FTA when so many workers are still struggling to find work would simply move our economy backward,” said Representative Louise Slaughter, a Democrat who leads the powerful Rules Committee.
The deal would be the largest for the US since the the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Canada and Mexico in 1994.
The US and South Korea completed painstaking negotiations in 2007, but neither nation’s legislature has ratified it.
Obama himself criticized the deal as a senator. But as president, Obama has found South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak to be one of his closest allies and has said he is convinced of the benefits of boosting trade with Asia’s fourth largest economy.
“It will strengthen our commercial ties and create enormous potential economic benefits and create jobs here in the United States, which is my No. 1 priority,” Obama said in Toronto.
Obama said he would send the agreement to Congress soon after November — the month of a G20 summit in South Korea as well as congressional elections in which Democrats are seen as vulnerable to losses.
Ironically, the rival Republican Party, while opposed to many of Obama’s key priorities such as climate and immigration legislation, may offer greater support than Democrats on the South Korea free trade agreement.
“Before the midterm elections, he cannot submit this to Congress. It’s impossible,” said Anthony Kim, a policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank.
“But after the election, there will be a new set of minds. It will be an uphill battle — there is no doubt about that — but I think it may come to life next year,” he said.
Sabina Dewan, associate director of international economic policy at the left-leaning Center for American Progress, said that any trade deal would be controversial at a time when the wobbly US economy is voters’ top concern.
However, she noted that Obama has set a goal of doubling US exports as a way to fuel growth and that, in a globalized economy, the US risked being left behind.
“Given the domestic climate and the challenges that President Obama is facing right now, he would not have picked this battle if he didn’t truly believe in the merits of it,” she said.
“Of course, any time you have a new trade agreement you have a restructuring of economic activity, which means that some people will be better off while others will have to adjust to change,” she said.
Former Democratic president Bill Clinton championed NAFTA despite staunch opposition from many in his party who have argued, then and now, that it has encouraged manufacturers to shift jobs to Mexico in search of cheaper labor.
Opposition to the South Korea deal has focused more on specific sectors, with legislators seeking more access for US autos and beef.
Beef is particularly sensitive for Lee after South Koreans held major street protests in 2008 charging that the US imports were unsafe. South Korea has resisted renegotiating any of the deal.
For South Korean policymakers, free trade is seen as a crucial strategy to boost the competitiveness of an economy lying between giants Japan and China. Seoul has also pursued trade pacts with the EU and India.
Han Duk-soo, the South Korean ambassador to Washington, said he has met with 35 — or more than one-third — of US senators and 135 House members to promote the deal which he argued would create some 72,000 US jobs.
Han last week joined three Democrats and three Republicans who set up a caucus in Congress in support of the deal.
“For three years, Congress and the White House have wrung their hands while this no-cost job creation measure sits cooling on the dinner table,” said one of the members, Republican Representative Peter Roskam of Illinois.
SOLVED: Domestic orders have already overtaken the total sold to China last year, while the Canadian and US representative offices posted messages of support A joint effort by groups and individuals in Taiwan and abroad to prop up sales of pineapples after China announced a ban on imports of the fruit succeeded in just four days, the Council of Agriculture (COA) said yesterday. China on Friday announced that it would suspend imports of Taiwanese pineapples starting on Monday, citing biosafety concerns. Following the announcement, the council urged the public to assist farmers by purchasing pineapples, saying it hoped to sell 20,000 tonnes of the fruit domestically and 30,000 tonnes in exports. “Domestic orders have already surpassed the total sold to China last year,” COA Minister
Taiwanese netizens and politicians yesterday mocked a Chinese plan to build a transportation network linking Beijing and Taipei, calling it “science fiction” and “daydreaming.” Their comments were in reaction to the Chinese State Council’s release last week of its “Guidelines on the National Comprehensive Transportation Network Plan,” which include several proposed transportation links, with one map showing a line running from China’s Jingjinji Metropolitan Region (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) across the Taiwan Strait to Taipei. “This is the Chinese leadership daydreaming again of [fulfilling its] fantasy of extending China’s transportation network to Taiwan. I suggest people regard it as science fiction,” Democratic Progressive
‘UNITED FRONT’: Grooming young Taiwanese to become Internet celebrities or hosts is a Chinese tactic to spread propaganda to influence young people, a source said As part of its “united front” tactics, China has been grooming young Taiwanese to become Internet celebrities or Internet program hosts, a source said on condition of anonymity. Over the past year, about 1,000 Taiwanese living in China have participated in training programs and competitions for show hosts held in several cities, including Xiamen, Wenzhou and Hangzhou, the source said on Saturday. “Beijing is taking advantage of the openness of the Internet to spread propaganda about acceptance of China, and about ‘national security,’” the source said, adding that Taiwan’s national security officials are racing to fix the problem. Chinese infiltration of
MAIN CHALLENGE: The US naval commander warned that China would seek to ‘forcibly change’ the balance of power in the region that would likely be permanent The US encourages Taiwan to invest in defense and obtain asymmetric defense capabilities, US Navy Admiral Philip Davidson said on Thursday. Davidson, commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, made the remark in a videoconference on defense matters hosted by the American Enterprise Institute think tank. “China is positioned to achieve overmatch” in its military capability by 2026, he said. When Beijing is able to, it would “likely choose to forcibly change” the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region, “and I would say the change in that status quo could be permanent,” he said. “China seeks a new world order, one with Chinese characteristics,