Sat, Sep 27, 2008 page10

• Public anger turns to CEO pay

  GOLDEN PARACHUTE Amid growing public fury, Congress is working on a financial bailout package that would restrict pay to heads of failed enterprises

  • AFP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  An angry US public and Congress are pushing to snip the rip cord on golden parachutes used by fat cat CEOs to escape Wall Street’s mayhem.

  Democrats in Congress — set to resume emergency talks yesterday with their Republican counterparts on a US$700 billion bailout for the financial industry — insisted that any agreed package include restrictions on executive pay.

  They caught the mood of a nation sickened at watching the titans of finance walk away from Wall Street disasters not only unscathed, but enriched.

  

  People lie underneath the iconic Wall Street bull during a rally in the financial district against the proposed government buyout of financial firms on Thursday in New York. In response to the global financial crisis, dozens of protesters from a variety of activist groups denounced the capitalist system, Wall Street and the administration. 

  PHOTO: AFP

  “The wealthiest people, those ... in the best position to pay, are being asked for no sacrifice at all,” read a petition to US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, which by Thursday, after three days, had 32,600 signatures.

  The petition, organized by independent Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, attacked what it described as the Treasury’s attempt to let bungling executives “continue to make exorbitant salaries and bonuses.”

  Those huge pay checks, bonuses and Midas-like farewells encapsulate what the public sees as Wall Street’s greed-is-good philosophy.

  For example, the CEO of bankrupt Lehman Brothers, Richard Fuld, received total compensation of US$71.9 million last year, including stock, bonuses and other pay, a survey published by Forbes magazine showed.

  Martin Sullivan, the chief executive of AIG, who left the insurance giant before it was rescued this month by the federal government, received US$14 million, a survey in USA Today said. He also quit with a US$47 million severance package.

  Even punishment for those at the center of the chaos comes with a gold lining.

  When the government took over collapsed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, ousted bosses Daniel Mudd and Richard Syron were not allowed US$12.59 million in severance payments.

  Yet they still got out the door with US$9.43 million in retirement benefits.

  Public anger at such figures underlies skepticism about the entire government rescue.

  “We’ll never see that money again,” said Mathew May, a 24-year-old economics student attending a small demonstration near the New York Stock Exchange. “They deregulated the markets and ran wild. Now we’re bailing them out.”

  Arun Gupta, an editor of alternative New York newspaper the Indypendent, said there was “socialism for the rich and dog-eat-dog capitalism for the rest of us.”

  “Think about it,” Gupta wrote in an e-mail that quickly circulated to thousands of activists and inspired the New York street protest.

  “They said providing healthcare for 9 million children, perhaps costing US$6 billion a year, was too expensive, but there’s evidently no sum of money large enough that will sate the Wall Street pigs,” Gupta said.

  And left-wingers are not the only ones speaking out.

  Newt Gingrich, the fiercely conservative former speaker in the House of Representatives, wrote in the National Review that the bailouts, likely to top a trillion dollars, smack of “crony capitalism.”

  “Doesn’t that mean that we’re using the taxpayers’ money to hire people to save their friends with even more taxpayer money?” he asked.

  Forbes, the magazine of the rich and the wealthy, also said enough was enough.

  “The compensation schemes for Wall Street CEOs should be capped to a small fixed amount,” national editor Robert Lenzner wrote.

  “The rest should be dependent on performance in a way that does not reward taking greater risk than is prudent. If CEOs don’t perform, they should get nothing,” he wrote.

  One worker in the New York finance sector, who asked not to be named, said his colleagues were as angry as the general public.

  “A lot of people are very upset that managers in their own companies and captains of industry in other areas made some really, really bad decisions,” he said.

  “The most insulting thing is the golden parachutes where these jackals from Fannie and Freddie, having destroyed the company, walked away with millions .... It all comes down to greed,” he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Saudi Arabia’s UAE ‘mudslinging’ threatens new crisis

  • 2

    Coast guard flags about 1,900 Chinese vessels

  • 3

    Forest, Celtic into play-offs as Villa fight back

  • 4

    ‘French Spider-Man’ praises Honnold’s Taipei 101 climb

  • 5

    Doncic sparks Lakers over the Bulls in Chicago