Starbucks hit a roadblock trying to export its business model to Australia, a robust coffee culture where customers already knew the difference between a macchiato and an affogato, local traders say.
The US giant announced last week that it would close 61 of its 84 Australian outlets by yesterday, saying “challenges unique to the Australian market” were behind the decision, which cost almost 700 jobs.
The statement from Starbucks’ head office in Seattle did not say what made Australia different, but did point out: “There are no other international markets that need to be addressed in this manner.”
Starbucks Asia Pacific president John Culver was more forthcoming about why the company was on the retreat in Australia, eight years after opening its first store in Sydney.
“I think what we’ve seen is that Australia has a very sophisticated coffee culture,” he said in a newspaper interview.
A wave of post-war immigrants from Turkey, Greece and Italy means that for decades Australians had been enjoying the “coffee experience” Starbucks virtually created from scratch in the US.
Both Sydney and Melbourne have Italian enclaves lined with cafes where old men sip espressos at outdoor tables through the day and trendy young couples gather in the evening for a caffeine fix.
Starbucks’ idea of making itself a “third place” in customers’ lives between home and work was a novelty in the US, where in many small towns cafe culture consisted of filter coffee on a hot plate.
But Melbourne cafe owner Jeremy Jenkins said the situation was different in Australia, where baristas have been plying their trade at steaming espresso machines since the 1950s.
“People come in our cafe because they know us and they know they’ll get good coffee, we’re part of the local community,” he said.
“Starbucks is a McDonald’s coffee experience. It’s not about the quality of the coffee, it’s about convenience and location,” he said.
Starbucks also closed 600 stores in the US early last month in a move widely seen as a response to belt-tightening among customers less inclined to spend money on luxuries like coffee in tough economic times.
Commentators have suggested similar problems hit Starbucks in Australia, but the lines outside the Met Cafe in central Sydney on a recent windy winter’s day indicated many customers were not yet ready to sacrifice their coffee hit.
Met Cafe owner Brendan Smart said Starbucks had expanded too quickly in Australia.
“A few years ago there weren’t that many of them and they seemed to be going OK, but then all of a sudden, they were everywhere,” he said. “Some city blocks had three Starbucks on them — it’s crazy.”
Smart said many customers had told him they did not want to buy their coffee from a corporate giant and those who had tried Starbucks were not impressed by the product, saying it did not compare with the numerous local brews available.
“What we do isn’t rocket science, I’m the first to admit that, but you’ve got to have a passion for coffee that involves everything from grinding the beans to operating the machine,” he said. “You go into Starbucks and it’s full of teenagers behind the counter. I’d question whether they have that passion.”
Starbucks now plans to streamline its operation to 23 stores in Australia’s largest cities Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane.
The Ministry of Transportation and Communications yesterday inaugurated the Danjiang Bridge across the Tamsui River in New Taipei City, saying that the structure would be an architectural icon and traffic artery for Taiwan. Feted as a major engineering achievement, the Danjiang Bridge is 920m long, 211m tall at the top of its pylon, and is the longest single-pylon asymmetric cable-stayed bridge in the world, the government’s Web site for the structure said. It was designed by late Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid. The structure, with a maximum deck of 70m, accommodates road and light rail traffic, and affords a 200m navigation channel for boats,
PRECISION STRIKES: The most significant reason to deploy HIMARS to outlying islands is to establish a ‘dead zone’ that the PLA would not dare enter, a source said A High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) would be deployed to Penghu County and Dongyin Island (東引) in Lienchiang County (Matsu) to force the Chinese military to retreat at least 100km from the coastline, a military source said yesterday. Taiwan has been procuring HIMARS and Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) from the US in batches. Once all batches have been delivered, Taiwan would possess 111 HIMARS units and 504 ATACMS, which have a range of 300km. Considering that “offense is the best defense,” the military plans to forward-deploy the systems to outlying islands such as Penghu and Dongyin so that
WHAT WAS ALL THAT FOR? Jaw Shaw-kong said that Cheng Li-wen had pushed for more drastic cuts and attacked him, just for the outcome to be nearly identical to his bill The legislature yesterday passed a supplementary budget bill to fund the purchase of separate packages of US military equipment, with the combined amount of spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.8 billion). The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) used their legislative majority to pass the bill, which runs until 2033 and has two main funding provisions. One was for NT$300 billion of arms sales already approved by the US for Taiwan on Dec. 17 last year, the other was for NT$480 billion for another arms package expected to be announced by Washington. The bill, which fell short of the NT$1.25
‘CLEAR MESSAGE’: The bill would set up an interagency ‘tiger team’ to review sanctions tools and other economic options to help deter any Chinese aggression toward Taiwan US Representative Young Kim has introduced a bill to deter Chinese aggression against Taiwan, calling for an interagency “tiger team” to preplan coordinated sanctions and economic measures in response to possible Chinese military or political action against Taiwan. “[Chinese President] Xi Jinping [習近平] has directed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. China has a plan. America should have one too,” Kim said in a news release on Thursday last week. She introduced the “Deter PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression against Taiwan act” to “ensure the US has a coordinated sanctions strategy ready should