Beijing’s anti-monopoly act takes effect this week but its introduction, which experts say will change how business is done in China more than any other recent law, remains surrounded by confusion.
The law, which comes into force on Friday after more than two decades in the making, calls for national security reviews for foreign investments, protects key Chinese industries and grants authorities substantial discretion.
But the government has yet to say who will enforce the law, which covers mergers, price fixing and day-to-day business agreements.
“This is a problem and everyone knows it,” said Cheng Yuan, a Beijing-based antitrust lawyer at the firm Linklaters.
Passed last August, the act overhauls a mix of laws and regulations covering pricing, foreign investment and anti-competitive practices.
While multinationals previously had to meet strict competition rules in other countries, they faced little scrutiny in China. In mergers, foreign companies had few filing requirements and Chinese companies almost none at all.
The new law changes the situation dramatically, but aside from broad outlines, the government has yet to announce how the rules or new institutions will work in practice, Cheng said.
Whoever enforces the law will wield significant powers, including the right to carry out spot inspections, question business operators and check bank accounts.
Penalties include fines of up to 10 percent of sales revenue for making anti-competitive agreements or abusing a dominant position.
Penalties of up to 500,000 yuan (US$73,000) — large for Chinese law — will be handed to companies that fail to follow merger rules or industry associations that behave like cartels.
Most expect the new requirements to be handled by the Ministry of Commerce, the National Development and Reform Commission and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce who currently oversee mergers, pricing and unfair competition respectively.
“I think the authorities know this is not realistic because these areas are all linked,” Cheng said. “You can’t really separate them.”
“There will be conflicts, there will be different views and that will not provide good guidance for business,” he said, adding responsibility might eventually be vested in a single authority, but it could take years.
Factors such as the Olympics and the Sichuan earthquake may be behind the delays, but lawyers said a flurry of guidelines could come soon after the law takes effect.
Details of how security measures will work, guidance on abuse of dominant market positions and specifics on what sorts of agreements must be reviewed are expected soon, said Martyn Huckerby, a lawyer at Clifford Chance who shuttles between London and Shanghai.
“Many of our clients are looking for clarity on how the new enforcement structure will operate,” Huckerby said.
The lack of guidelines could actually help companies by buying more time to ensure practices comply with the law, he said.
The law’s aim is to meet international standards, but how it will be enforced against state-owned companies is unclear, Huckerby said.
It gives the government discretion not to apply it to companies linked to the “lifelines of the national economy and national security.”
“There’s one suggestion that state-owned enterprises will be exempt, another suggestion is the law will apply equally to state-owned enterprises and in fact the government will ensure that state-owned enterprises comply,” he said.
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to