Beijing’s anti-monopoly act takes effect this week but its introduction, which experts say will change how business is done in China more than any other recent law, remains surrounded by confusion.
The law, which comes into force on Friday after more than two decades in the making, calls for national security reviews for foreign investments, protects key Chinese industries and grants authorities substantial discretion.
But the government has yet to say who will enforce the law, which covers mergers, price fixing and day-to-day business agreements.
“This is a problem and everyone knows it,” said Cheng Yuan, a Beijing-based antitrust lawyer at the firm Linklaters.
Passed last August, the act overhauls a mix of laws and regulations covering pricing, foreign investment and anti-competitive practices.
While multinationals previously had to meet strict competition rules in other countries, they faced little scrutiny in China. In mergers, foreign companies had few filing requirements and Chinese companies almost none at all.
The new law changes the situation dramatically, but aside from broad outlines, the government has yet to announce how the rules or new institutions will work in practice, Cheng said.
Whoever enforces the law will wield significant powers, including the right to carry out spot inspections, question business operators and check bank accounts.
Penalties include fines of up to 10 percent of sales revenue for making anti-competitive agreements or abusing a dominant position.
Penalties of up to 500,000 yuan (US$73,000) — large for Chinese law — will be handed to companies that fail to follow merger rules or industry associations that behave like cartels.
Most expect the new requirements to be handled by the Ministry of Commerce, the National Development and Reform Commission and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce who currently oversee mergers, pricing and unfair competition respectively.
“I think the authorities know this is not realistic because these areas are all linked,” Cheng said. “You can’t really separate them.”
“There will be conflicts, there will be different views and that will not provide good guidance for business,” he said, adding responsibility might eventually be vested in a single authority, but it could take years.
Factors such as the Olympics and the Sichuan earthquake may be behind the delays, but lawyers said a flurry of guidelines could come soon after the law takes effect.
Details of how security measures will work, guidance on abuse of dominant market positions and specifics on what sorts of agreements must be reviewed are expected soon, said Martyn Huckerby, a lawyer at Clifford Chance who shuttles between London and Shanghai.
“Many of our clients are looking for clarity on how the new enforcement structure will operate,” Huckerby said.
The lack of guidelines could actually help companies by buying more time to ensure practices comply with the law, he said.
The law’s aim is to meet international standards, but how it will be enforced against state-owned companies is unclear, Huckerby said.
It gives the government discretion not to apply it to companies linked to the “lifelines of the national economy and national security.”
“There’s one suggestion that state-owned enterprises will be exempt, another suggestion is the law will apply equally to state-owned enterprises and in fact the government will ensure that state-owned enterprises comply,” he said.
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
RIGHT DIRECTION: Taiwan’s efforts to prevent forced labor include a proposal to ‘fully prohibit’ employers from withholding workers’ documents, an official said Taiwan is to establish a mechanism to restrict imports of goods linked to forced labor, the Executive Yuan said yesterday, after the US proposed imposing additional tariffs on Taiwanese goods over labor concerns. “The Ministry of Labor and the Ministry of Economic Affairs are to establish an interministerial review procedure,” Executive Yuan spokesperson Michelle Lee (李慧芝) said at a news briefing in Taipei. “The government is to use the Foreign Trade Act [貿易法] as the legal basis to restrict imports of goods produced with forced labor” and bring its supply chain governance more in line with international standards on human rights, resilience
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
RSS