Competition in China's booming Internet sector has turned nasty ahead of the Beijing Olympics, with Sohu.com (搜狐) upsetting its rivals through a lucrative sponsorship deal that is now being challenged.
The Chinese portal paid a reported US$30 million in 2005 for the rights to set up the Games Web site for the Beijing Olympics organizing committee and to use the logo of the event -- the signature silhouette of a dancing man.
However, it has since put the squeeze on rivals by claiming the deal included exclusive rights to host all the advertising by Beijing Games sponsors bearing the official logo.
PHOTO: AFP
This would give Sohu.com an effective Internet monopoly on ads by companies such as Adidas, Volkswagen, Johnson & Johnson and Bank of China, and its rivals are fuming.
The organizing committee's legal department is now working to untangle the affair that could determine who gets millions of dollars in advertising revenue between now and the August Games.
It could also give an invaluable boost in the broader Internet advertising sector, which marketing analyst iResearch believes will be worth more than US$1 billion this year, up nearly 40 percent on last year.
Sohu.com said its rivals felt they cannot allow the firm to gain an edge through its Olympic deal.
"In China the Internet industry is very tough and the competition will do whatever it can to fight this deal because they know it's a big one," said Chen Luming (
He said that Olympic sponsorships were tailored to exclusivity, which accounted for the growing success of the marketing program of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and of the Beijing organizing committee (BOCOG).
But Internet sponsorship is a new category, introduced for the Beijing Olympics for the first time, and the exact extent of the rights enjoyed by the holder have yet to be clearly defined, BOCOG said.
"Our legal department is still working to determine what is exclusive and what is not," said Niu Wei, an official in BOCOG's media and communications department.
China's other major portals have formed an alliance against Sohu.com to fight the exclusivity claim and say they plan to put together Internet content for the Games and sell ads around it.
Zeng Fuhu (
"They have paid to get the rights to set up the official Web site of the Games and we are okay with that," he said. "They get to use the logo as well but anything beyond that is bogus."
Zeng says he should know. He worked for Sohu.com as business department director before defecting to Tom.com two years ago. One of his projects at Sohu.com was the Olympic deal.
"The claim about exclusivity on advertising has no basis ... It would be like saying that all Olympic sponsors in the US would have to put their TV ads on NBC," he said.
The network is the official US television rights holder with exclusive rights to cover the Olympics.
An IOC official said Sohu.com's sponsorship deal should not guarantee the portal "exclusive or special editorial or advertising rights on their Web site in relation to the Beijing Games."
However, BOCOG has yet to issue a ruling, while sponsors have been left in the dark.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks
Nearly half of Taiwanese believe President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has not done enough to prepare the nation against Chinese aggression, the a poll released yesterday by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation showed. Asked whether the Tsai administration’s military and non-military preparations to defend Taiwan are adequate, 30.6 percent said they were “mostly inadequate” and 18.9 percent said they “very inadequate,” while 25.7 percent said they were “mostly adequate” and 7.1 percent said they were “very adequate.” Another 17.6 percent had no opinion or did not know enough to form a judgement. Still, 51 percent of respondents approved of Tsai’s national defense policy,
RSS