Wed, Aug 29, 2007 News Editorials 487453043 visits
 Photo News
 More World Business
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    Whole Foods says purchase of Wild Oats successful

    TAKEOVER: Whole Foods has garnered enough shares from its tender offer despite opposition from a trade commission and consumer groups

    AP, DALLAS
    Wednesday, Aug 29, 2007, Page 10

    Whole Foods Market Inc said it had support from enough shareholders of Wild Oats Markets Inc to complete the purchase of its rival, putting a successful end to a takeover opposed by US federal antitrust regulators.

    Whole Foods said on Monday it would own 84.1 percent of the outstanding shares of Wild Oats after its tender offer of US$18.5 per share closed on Monday, and another 12.7 percent were subject to guaranteed delivery over the next three days.

    guaranteed

    The company said that 25.2 million shares of Wild Oats were tendered and not withdrawn and another 3.8 million shares were subject to guaranteed delivery.

    After purchasing the shares guaranteed for delivery, Whole Foods said it would acquire all the remaining outstanding Wild Oats shares.

    opposition

    Austin-based Whole Foods announced its US$565 million offer for Wild Oats in February, but the Federal Trade Commission and some consumer groups opposed the deal, arguing it would result in lower competition and higher prices for premium groceries.

    The commission filed a lawsuit in June to block the takeover and succeeded in delaying it for several weeks, forcing Whole Foods to extend its tender offer several times.

    denied

    However, last week, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals in Washington denied a commission request to delay the sale while regulators appealed a lower court ruling.

    The appeals court said the commission had ``raised some questions'' about the deal but failed to show that it would be successful in overturning the decision of the lower court.
    This story has been viewed 692 times.

  • Advertising