Tue, Nov 05, 2019 - Page 6 News List

Tourism industry warns Queensland against lethal shark control measures

UNNECESSARY:A statement signed by several groups said that more research into shark behavior was needed, not more of the permanent baited hook drum lines

The Guardian

Peak bodies representing the Queensland tourism industry have resisted calls for changes to Great Barrier Reef protection legislation to allow for lethal shark control measures.

The strong statement, cosigned by several tourism bodies, said any such move would be an “unnecessary step” and could affect the reef’s world heritage status.

Instead, they want governments to conduct more research into shark behavior and develop innovative management tools, informed by that science.

The statement said the recent political bickering and “unnecessarily alarming publicity” about lethal shark control measures had the potential to harm the tourism sector.

Debate has become particularly hysterical in recent months. In September, the federal court upheld a tribunal ruling that the Queensland government could not use lethal shark control measures — typically baited hooks known as drum lines — within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.

British tourists Alistair Raddon, 28, and his friend Danny Maggs, 22, last week were attacked and injured while on a snorkeling trip in the Whitsundays. Raddon had his foot bitten off.

In their statement, tourism authorities noted recent incidents had occurred in the Whitsundays, where permanent drum lines have never been installed.

“Prior to the most recent shark incident, the ruling … put the spotlight on the use of shark control measures in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and led to conflicting views being articulated at a political level,” the statement by tourism authorities said.

“We urge all parties in this discussion to determine the way forward without unintended further damage to the traveling public’s perception about the exposure to risk when visiting the Great Barrier Reef. Any unnecessarily alarming publicity has the potential to further damage a perception-driven tourism industry,” they added.

The Queensland government removed drum lines from the park immediately after the most recent court ruling.

Queensland Minister for Agricultural Industry Development and Fisheries Mark Furner has written to Australian Minister of the Environment Sussan Ley, asking for amendments to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Act (GBRMPA) to circumvent the ruling and allow for the reinstatement of lethal shark control.

The tourism industry statement said doing so would be “an unnecessary step to achieve the outcomes that are sought by both industry and we would suggest, by the community.”

“The adverse implication of changing the GBRMPA Act could be far-reaching and may have a detrimental bearing on the Great Barrier Reef’s status as a world heritage area,” the statement said.

Drum lines could be reinstalled at popular mainland swimming beaches as a temporary measure, as the tribunal decision had allowed for a phase-out of lethal measures, the statement said.

However, ultimately more comprehensive research was needed around shark behavior, including understanding recent apparent changes to behavior, and “improved and innovative management tools” informed by science, the tourism groups said.

“Australia’s reputation as a safe destination is a critical competitive advantage for our destination,” the statement said.

“This reputation is not built on a claim that accidents cannot happen here, but on an implied assurance we have in place appropriate precautionary measures for all circumstances and that we respond compassionately and professionally to any incident,” it said.

This story has been viewed 1805 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top