Peak bodies representing the Queensland tourism industry have resisted calls for changes to Great Barrier Reef protection legislation to allow for lethal shark control measures.
The strong statement, cosigned by several tourism bodies, said any such move would be an “unnecessary step” and could affect the reef’s world heritage status.
Instead, they want governments to conduct more research into shark behavior and develop innovative management tools, informed by that science.
The statement said the recent political bickering and “unnecessarily alarming publicity” about lethal shark control measures had the potential to harm the tourism sector.
Debate has become particularly hysterical in recent months. In September, the federal court upheld a tribunal ruling that the Queensland government could not use lethal shark control measures — typically baited hooks known as drum lines — within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.
British tourists Alistair Raddon, 28, and his friend Danny Maggs, 22, last week were attacked and injured while on a snorkeling trip in the Whitsundays. Raddon had his foot bitten off.
In their statement, tourism authorities noted recent incidents had occurred in the Whitsundays, where permanent drum lines have never been installed.
“Prior to the most recent shark incident, the ruling … put the spotlight on the use of shark control measures in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and led to conflicting views being articulated at a political level,” the statement by tourism authorities said.
“We urge all parties in this discussion to determine the way forward without unintended further damage to the traveling public’s perception about the exposure to risk when visiting the Great Barrier Reef. Any unnecessarily alarming publicity has the potential to further damage a perception-driven tourism industry,” they added.
The Queensland government removed drum lines from the park immediately after the most recent court ruling.
Queensland Minister for Agricultural Industry Development and Fisheries Mark Furner has written to Australian Minister of the Environment Sussan Ley, asking for amendments to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Act (GBRMPA) to circumvent the ruling and allow for the reinstatement of lethal shark control.
The tourism industry statement said doing so would be “an unnecessary step to achieve the outcomes that are sought by both industry and we would suggest, by the community.”
“The adverse implication of changing the GBRMPA Act could be far-reaching and may have a detrimental bearing on the Great Barrier Reef’s status as a world heritage area,” the statement said.
Drum lines could be reinstalled at popular mainland swimming beaches as a temporary measure, as the tribunal decision had allowed for a phase-out of lethal measures, the statement said.
However, ultimately more comprehensive research was needed around shark behavior, including understanding recent apparent changes to behavior, and “improved and innovative management tools” informed by science, the tourism groups said.
“Australia’s reputation as a safe destination is a critical competitive advantage for our destination,” the statement said.
“This reputation is not built on a claim that accidents cannot happen here, but on an implied assurance we have in place appropriate precautionary measures for all circumstances and that we respond compassionately and professionally to any incident,” it said.
“We accept that visiting any natural environment and any interaction with wildlife requires appropriate awareness for operators and visitors, based on accurate information. It also calls for behavioral guidelines and adequate precautions to be put in place,” it added.
“Unfortunately, in the context of the recent incidents involving sharks in the Whitsundays, we have a very limited understanding of the scientific facts that might explain changes to shark behavior or movements in the different locations visited by tourism operators across the Great Barrier Reef,” the statement said.
“Long-term solutions will require a clearer understanding of shark movements and detailed analysis of the recent incidents,” it said. “Guided by new scientific evidence, the industry is keen to work with government to implement improved and innovative management tools that can achieve better outcomes.”
Polling last week by the Humane Society International Australia, which ran the tribunal case against lethal shark control, found 73 percent of Queenslanders supported replacing drum lines with non-lethal shark control measures, such as drone technology.
Choosing a full-fledged confrontation with the US due to the loss of a megacontract for submarines for Australia, France is making a risky bet and other nations are not rushing to its defense. After Australia renounced its deal for conventional submarines in favor of US nuclear-powered ones, France took the extraordinary step of pulling its ambassadors from Washington and Canberra for consultations. Bertrand Badie, an international relations professor at the Sciences Po institute in Paris, said France had put itself in a position where it can only appear to be backing down or losing face once its ambassador returns to the US,
Could delivering COVID-19 immunity directly to the nose — the area of the body via which it is mostly transmitted — help conquer the pandemic? The WHO says clinical trials are under way to evaluate eight nasal spray vaccines that target COVID-19. The most advanced effort so far by China’s Xiamen University, the University of Hong Kong and Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy has completed phase 2 trials. “When the virus infects someone, it usually gets in through the nose,” said researcher Nathalie Mielcarek, who is working with the Lille Pasteur Institute to develop a nasal spray vaccine against whooping cough. “The
FREE-FOR-ALL CONTEST: Taro Kono’s popular support means that he ‘probably has the edge, but if he has a lead, it’s a very vulnerable one,’ an Asia expert said The campaign to become Japan’s next prime minister began yesterday, with four candidates vying for leadership of the ruling party in an unusually close race. In televised speeches, the candidates set out their priorities, from boosting Japan’s digital prowess to addressing the falling birthrate. Among them are two women hoping to lead a nation that has never had a female prime minister, although both are considered long shots. The race follows Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga’s shock announcement that he would not run for head of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Whoever the party picks in a Sept. 29 vote is to contest
PLANNING TO REOPEN: Amid 1,607 new COVID-19 cases, the country is making a shift away from lockdowns, acknowledging that outbreaks will happen Australia reported 1,607 new coronavirus cases yesterday as states and territories gradually shift from trying to eliminate outbreaks to living with the virus. Victoria, home to about a quarter of Australia’s 25 million people, recorded 507 cases as Premier Daniel Andrews said a weeks-long lockdown will end once 70 percent of those 16 and older are fully vaccinated, whether or not there are new cases. Andrews said the state might reach that vaccination threshold around Oct. 26. About 43 percent of Victorians have been fully vaccinated, 46 percent nationwide. “We will do so cautiously, but make no mistake, we are opening this place