The US Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for the administration of US President Donald Trump to tap billions of dollars in Pentagon funds to build sections of a border wall with Mexico.
The court’s five conservative justices gave the administration the green light to begin work on four contracts it has awarded using US Department of Defense money.
Funding for the projects had been frozen by lower courts while a lawsuit over the money proceeded.
Photo: AFP
“Wow! Big VICTORY on the Wall. The United States Supreme Court overturns lower court injunction, allows Southern Border Wall to proceed. Big WIN for Border Security and the Rule of Law!” Trump tweeted after the ruling.
The action reverses the decision of a trial court, which in May froze the funds, and an appeals court, which earlier this month kept the freeze in place.
The freeze had prevented the government from tapping about US$2.5 billion in defense department money to replace existing sections of barriers in Arizona, California and New Mexico with more robust fencing.
The case on which the Supreme Court ruled began after the 35-day partial government shutdown that started in December last year.
Trump ended the shutdown in February after the US Congress gave him about US$1.4 billion in border wall funding, but the amount was far less than the US$5.7 billion he was seeking, and Trump then declared a national emergency to take cash from other government accounts.
The money Trump identified includes US$3.6 billion from military construction funds, US$2.5 billion in defense department money and US$600 million from the US Department of the Treasury’s asset forfeiture fund.
The case before the Supreme Court involved just the US$2.5 billion in defense department funds, which the administration says would be used to construct more than 160km of fencing.
The other funds were not at issue in the case.
The Treasury funds have so far survived legal challenges, and US Customs and Border Protection has earmarked the money for work in Texas’ Rio Grande Valley, but has not yet awarded contracts.
Transfer of the US$3.6 billion in military construction funds is awaiting approval from the defense secretary.
The lawsuit at the Supreme Court was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on behalf of the Sierra Club and Southern Border Communities Coalition.
The justices who lifted the freeze on the money did not give a lengthy explanation for their decision, but said among the reasons they were doing so was that the government had made a “sufficient showing at this stage” that those bringing the lawsuit do not have a right to challenge the decision to use the money.
ACLU lawyer Dror Ladin said after the court’s announcement that the fight “is not over.”
The case would continue, but the decision suggests an ultimate victory for the ACLU is unlikely. Even if the ACLU were to win, fencing would have already been built.
The administration had argued that if it was not able to finalize the contracts by Sept. 30, then it would lose the ability to use the funds and asked for a decision quickly.
LANDMARK CASE: ‘Every night we were dragged to US soldiers and sexually abused. Every week we were forced to undergo venereal disease tests,’ a victim said More than 100 South Korean women who were forced to work as prostitutes for US soldiers stationed in the country have filed a landmark lawsuit accusing Washington of abuse, their lawyers said yesterday. Historians and activists say tens of thousands of South Korean women worked for state-sanctioned brothels from the 1950s to 1980s, serving US troops stationed in country to protect the South from North Korea. In 2022, South Korea’s top court ruled that the government had illegally “established, managed and operated” such brothels for the US military, ordering it to pay about 120 plaintiffs compensation. Last week, 117 victims
‘HYANGDO’: A South Korean lawmaker said there was no credible evidence to support rumors that Kim Jong-un has a son with a disability or who is studying abroad South Korea’s spy agency yesterday said that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s daughter, Kim Ju-ae, who last week accompanied him on a high-profile visit to Beijing, is understood to be his recognized successor. The teenager drew global attention when she made her first official overseas trip with her father, as he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Analysts have long seen her as Kim’s likely successor, although some have suggested she has an older brother who is being secretly groomed as the next leader. The South Korean National Intelligence Service (NIS) “assesses that she [Kim Ju-ae]
In the week before his fatal shooting, right-wing US political activist Charlie Kirk cheered the boom of conservative young men in South Korea and warned about a “globalist menace” in Tokyo on his first speaking tour of Asia. Kirk, 31, who helped amplify US President Donald Trump’s agenda to young voters with often inflammatory rhetoric focused on issues such as gender and immigration, was shot in the neck on Wednesday at a speaking event at a Utah university. In Seoul on Friday last week, he spoke about how he “brought Trump to victory,” while addressing Build Up Korea 2025, a conservative conference
China has approved the creation of a national nature reserve at the disputed Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), claimed by Taiwan and the Philippines, the government said yesterday, as Beijing moves to reinforce its territorial claims in the contested region. A notice posted online by the Chinese State Council said that details about the area and size of the project would be released separately by the Chinese National Forestry and Grassland Administration. “The building of the Huangyan Island National Nature Reserve is an important guarantee for maintaining the diversity, stability and sustainability of the natural ecosystem of Huangyan Island,” the notice said. Scarborough