Sun, Jun 05, 2016 - Page 7 News List

Lethal drugs unnerve California doctors

AP, SAN DIEGO, california

Terry Petrovich on May 18 smiles in her home in Jamul, California.

Photo: AP

Terry Petrovich asked her oncologist point blank: “Am I going to count on you to help me achieve a good death?”

To her relief, he told her he would have no problem prescribing a lethal dose of drugs under California’s new law allowing such prescriptions for the terminally ill.

However, many in California’s medical community are grappling with the law that goes into effect on Thursday. Some physicians have told their patients they are not willing to play a role in intentionally ending a person’s life.

Catholic hospitals will not provide the prescriptions because it goes against the church’s stance on the issue, according to the Alliance of Catholic Health Care, which represents 48 facilities, 27 of which provide hospice services.

However, the organization cannot bar its affiliated physicians from talking about it, or referring patients to medical offices willing to prescribe such drugs.

Petrovich was diagnosed in 2012 with stage four non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma that has spread to her bone marrow.

“I’m not suicidal by any means,” said Petrovich, wearing a “Stupid Cancer Get Busy Living” T-shirt. “I want to keep hiking keep loving my dog, just keep living until I can’t anymore — and then I want that option.”

She fought for passage of the law after identifying with 29-year-old California resident Brittany Maynard, who was dying from brain cancer and moved to Oregon in 2014, the first state to make it legal, so she could take the drugs to end her suffering.

California has more safeguards than the four other US states — Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana — where it is allowed. Still there are concerns it will lead to hasty decisions, misdiagnoses and waning support for palliative care, in which dying people can be sedated to relieve suffering.

“I think everyone has that personal, ethical dilemma because we’re not really taught in medical school to cause someone’s death, and yet we certainly think society is moving toward wanting the option,” said Daniel Mirda of the Association of Northern California Oncologists.

Mirda opposed the bill because he did not think it was a doctor’s place to weigh in, but now he plans to decide on a case by case basis.

“The majority of physicians, it seems, are neutral, nervous, not comfortable prescribing it, but are not going to stop someone from seeking out another physician for help to do this,” he said.

California Hospital Association vice president of external affairs Jan Emerson-Shea said a terminally ill person is more likely to be prescribed the medicine when they are at home or in a hospice setting and not in a hospital.

It is not known when the first prescription could be written. Patients must be given six months or less to live, make two verbal requests within 15 days of each other and submit a written request.

After undergoing immunotherapy, Petrovich’s cancer appears stable and she is still working as the administrator of the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego.

However, she is knows that her cancer might become aggressive and the treatments ineffective.

She does not want her daughter to see her suffer like her own mother who died from ovarian cancer.

“I just heard this heartache in her voice,” said Petrovich, recalling one of the last conversations with her 77-year-old mother, who was bedridden in diapers after two rounds of chemotherapy.

This story has been viewed 1442 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top