Tue, Dec 01, 2009 page7

• US lawmakers question Afghan troop increase

  NEED MORE? Members of the US Congress questioned whether spending what could amount to an additional US$30 billion on the war was the country’s first priority

  • REUTERS AND AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  US President Barack Obama faces pressure from fellow Democrats, opposition Republicans and the international community even before he was to announce long-awaited plans yesterday for a big US troop increase in Afghanistan.

  Members of both parties laid out their expectations and concerns on Sunday about the president’s upcoming speech, which was set to be broadcast live after press time yesterday from the West Point Military Academy.

  Obama is widely expected to say he will add some 30,000 troops to the eight-year war effort, but lawmakers and an increasingly war-weary US public want answers to several open questions.

  How long will the US stay in Afghanistan and how does it plan to leave? How will Washington cover the war’s expensive price tag? What demands will be made on Afghan President Hamid Karzai?

  Many lawmakers focused on the cost of a troop increase in interviews on US television news shows on Sunday.

  “What is the capacity of our country to finance this particular type of situation as opposed to other ways of fighting al-Qaeda and the war against terror?” Richard Lugar, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on CNN’s State of the Union.

  Obama “really has to regain the approval of the American people as well as people around the world that we are on the right course,” Lugar said.

  The rising federal deficit is a growing political liability for Obama ahead of congressional elections in next November and increased war spending will add to concerns about the cost of pending legislation to overhaul the US healthcare system, his top domestic priority.

  The White House estimates it will cost about US$1 million per year for each additional soldier sent to Afghanistan, meaning a 30,000 to 40,000 troop increase would add about US$30 billion to US$40 billion per year to the war’s costs.

  The US now has about 68,000 soldiers in the war zone, with Britain, Germany, Canada, Australia and other allies making up the remaining 42,000 members of the multinational force.

  Democrats — who are generally less supportive of a troop increase than Republicans — want assurances that Obama will press Karzai to clamp down on corruption and speed the process of Afghans taking over responsibility for their own security.

  “The key to success in Afghanistan is the Afghan army taking on the Taliban,” Carl Levin, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on CBS’ Face the Nation.

  “The issue is how would additional combat forces ... increase the speed of the buildup of the Afghan army,” he said. “And that’s what I think the president is going to need to explain.”

  “The key here is an Afghan surge, not an American surge,” Levin said. “We cannot, by ourselves, win [the] war.”

  Representative David Obey, a Democrat who chairs the House Appropriations Committee that oversees a large chunk of government spending, said the money has better uses than in Afghanistan.

  “I have to see what US$400 billion or US$500 billion, US$600 billion, US$700 billion, over a decade, for this effort, will cost us on education, on our efforts to build the entire economy. And — and when you look at it that way, I come to a different conclusion than he does,” Obey, appearing on CNN, said of the troop increase.

  Obey has introduced legislation to impose a war surtax beginning in 2011. The bill would exempt service members and their families.

  “If this war is important enough to engage in the long term, it’s important enough to pay for,” Obey said.

  Others said Obama needed to spell out the demands for other nations if he commits more US forces and funds to the war.

  “I’ve got a real problem about expanding this war where the rest of the world is sitting around and saying ‘Isn’t it a nice thing that the taxpayers of the United States and the US military are doing the work that the rest of the world should be doing?’” Independent Senator Bernie Sanders said on ABC’s This Week program.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    UK navy unveils plans near Taiwan

  • 2

    US involvement in Iran could affect Taiwan: expert

  • 3

    Lai begins 10-stop tour with speech on ‘nation’

  • 4

    Chikungunya fever cases rise to 13, CDC says

  • 5

    31 charged over KMT-led recall campaign forged petitions