Nuclear power proponents yesterday said they would launch new referendum proposals to extend the operation of nuclear power plants and relocate nuclear waste stored on Orchid Island (Lanyu, 蘭嶼), after the government said it would decommission the reactors on schedule.
A majority of voters on Nov. 24 last year voted in favor of abolishing Article 95-1 of the Electricity Act (電業法) — which states that all nuclear power generation facilities must halt operations by 2025 — in a referendum held alongside the local elections.
However, the Ministry of Economic Affairs on Jan. 31 said it has no plans to extend the 40-year permits of the operational nuclear reactors or resume the construction of the mothballed Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, sparking criticism.
The Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) has started decommissioning, but the municipality is opposed to a nuclear waste storage for the plant proposed by Taiwan Power Co.
Meanwhile, the permits for four reactors at the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in the city’s Wanli District (萬里) and the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Ma-anshan (馬鞍山), Pingtung County, are to expire between 2021 and 2025, according to the Atomic Energy Council.
The council has said that applications to extend reactors’ operations must be filed five years before permits expire, but that is merely a rule set by the council, which it can adjust at will, said Nuclear Myth Busters founder Huang Shih-hsiu (黃士修), who launched last year’s referendum about the Electicity Act.
To push the government to respect the electorate’s support for nuclear power, Huang and other supporters would launch three new referendum proposals to extend the three operational plants’ licenses, resume construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and relocate barrels of low-radioactivity nuclear waste stored on Orchid Island, he said.
The second proposal last year garnered more than 200,000 signatures and would be forwarded to the Central Election Commission for review next month, he said.
Critics have said that Huang does not care about Orchid Island’s residents, but he would prove them wrong by launching a referendum proposal to push the government to move nuclear waste back to the plants, he said, adding that nuclear waste can be safe if it is properly stored in a secluded location.
The proponents would have more discussions with Orchid Island’s Tao people about how they should launch the nuclear waste proposal and announce an initial plan later this week, said Liao Yen-peng (廖彥朋), a nuclear power supporter and Chinese Society of Medical Physics member.
Separately yesterday, opponents of nuclear power called on the government to decommission the plants according to schedule, saying that their locations near fault lines continue to pose a danger to local residents.
OVERHAUL NEEDED: The government should improve its agricultural processing capabilities and expand to new markets to limit its reliance on China, an expert said China’s ban on Taiwanese pineapples was “unsurprising,” and Taiwan should have years ago altered its produce export strategies and target customers, experts said. China on Friday abruptly suspended imports of pineapples from Taiwan, saying that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful biological entities” on the fruit. Calling it an “unfriendly” move, the Council of Agriculture (COA) said that 99.79 percent of the pineapples sent to China since last year have met China’s import standards. Chiao Chun (焦鈞), the author of Fruits and Politics — A Recollection of Cross-strait Agricultural Interaction Over the Past Decade (水果政治學：兩岸農業交流十年回顧與展望), said that China’s announcement is clearly targeting
The Council of Agriculture yesterday signed a Taiwan-Australia Agricultural Cooperation Implementation clause to open a new export market for the nation’s pineapple crop. The clause is an addition to existing cooperation measures, it said. China on Friday last week abruptly announced that it would suspend pineapple imports from Taiwan starting on Monday, on grounds that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful organisms” in shipments of the fruit. The public and private sectors have since joined hands to purchase the local fruit to help the nation’s pineapple farmers. Canberra has requested that all pineapples for export to Australia have their crown buds removed,
DECADES OF INFLUENCE: Over the past 20 years, China has made inroads with Aborigines, funding political campaigns and trips, a legislator said Lawmakers have called on the National Security Bureau to investigate claims of pervasive Chinese influence among Aboriginal communities. Legislators pointed to a surge in communist propaganda and Chinese-funded projects over the past few years, which they say are aimed at infiltrating and buying political influence among Aboriginal communities. “China has for decades carried out wide-ranging ‘united front’ tactics and propaganda campaigns targeting Aborigines,” said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩), a member of the Puyuma community in Taitung County. “Now, they are influencing elections for local councilors and village chiefs, offering money for candidates to mount their campaigns, and to
DISSATISFACTION? If the referendums collect more than 700,000 signatures each, they would have gotten the most signatures in the shortest time, the party said The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) two referendum petitions — one on banning the importation of pork with traces of ractopamine and the other on holding referendums on the same day as national elections — had as of Thursday gathered 691,398 and 674,497 signatures respectively, the party said yesterday. If the petitions collect more than 700,000 signatures apiece, they would have garnered the most signatures in the shortest time since the Referendum Act (公民投票法) was amended in 2017, party officials said. The KMT proposed the “anti-ractopamine pork” or “food safety” referendum just days after President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) announcement on Aug. 28 last