Lawyers said that the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) is unlikely to win a lawsuit he is preparing to annul the result of Saturday’s Taipei mayoral election.
Of the top three in the five-way race, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) garnered 580,820 votes, or 41.05 percent, while Ting received 577,566 (40.82 percent) and Pasuya Yao (姚文智) of the Democratic Progressive Party got 244,641 votes (17.29 percent).
Ting yesterday said he would apply to have the election annulled, as simultaneous voting and vote-counting — which arose after long lines at polling stations saw some not close until 7:46pm, while counting and reporting at others began shortly after 4pm — produced a “dump-save effect,” with pan-green voters seeing early results indicating Yao was out of contention and therefore “sacrificing” their vote for him in favor of Ko to keep the KMT from winning.
However, lawyers cited the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), saying that simultaneous voting and vote-counting is not illegal.
According to Article 19 of the act, voters who arrive at a polling station before a specified time — 4pm for Saturday’s elections — are allowed to vote even after the deadline, lawyer Lin Chun-yi (林俊儀) said.
According to the law, a “polling station” is not limited to the indoor space where voting is conducted, Lin said, adding that voters who arrived by 4pm and were in line were legally allowed to vote.
In addition, the act does not stipulate that voting in an electoral district must be completed before counting can begin there, he said.
However, there were some legal uncertainties in the elections, he said.
The election commissions need to plan more carefully or solve problems through amendments to prevent unfair voting, he said.
Lawyer Liu Pang-hsiu (劉邦繡), who has previously been a polling station manager, said that according to Article 69 of the act, Ting can apply for a recount, as the difference between votes for him and Ko was within 0.3 percent.
According to the act, polling stations are to immediately begin counting ballots after voting ends, he said.
Election staff followed the rules and did not do anything illegal, Liu said, adding that Ting’s chances of having the election declared invalid on this account are slim.
Ting first needs to prove how many, or what percentage, of polling stations were still receiving votes 4pm, lawyer Lin Chun-feng (林俊峰) said.
Second, he needs to determine how many voters cast ballots under these circumstances, he said.
Third, he needs to determine how many voters were viewing live updates of results while they were standing in line, Lin Chun-feng said, adding that the most difficult point for Ting to prove would be: “How many people changed their vote because of this?”
“Can all of the blame be put on the Central Election Commission or the Taipei City Election Commission?” he asked.
Meanwhile, people familiar with judicial matters said that according to the act, a lawsuit to invalidate an election is different from a lawsuit to invalidate the winner’s elected status.
In the first case, a suit would be against an election commission, they said.
If the courts determine that there were illegalities in a commission’s handling of the process — enough to influence the results — they could declare the result invalid and a new election would be held, they said.
A lawsuit against a winner can be filed by candidates in the same electoral district, prosecutors or an election commission, they said.
One of the reasons for this kind of lawsuit is when the winner prevented a candidate from campaigning through assault, intimidation or other illegal methods, they said.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday voiced dissatisfaction with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans- Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), whose latest meeting, concluded earlier the same day, appeared not to address the country’s application. In a statement, MOFA said the CPTPP commission had "once again failed to fairly process Taiwan’s application," attributing the inaction to the bloc’s "succumbing to political pressure," without elaborating. Taiwan submitted its CPTPP application under the name "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu" on Sept. 22, 2021 -- less than a week after China
THE GOOD WORD: More than 100 colleges on both sides of the Pacific will work together to bring students to Taiwan so they can learn Mandarin where it is spoken A total of 102 universities from Taiwan and the US are collaborating in a push to promote Taiwan as the first-choice place to learn Mandarin, with seven Mandarin learning centers stood up in the US to train and support teachers, the Foundation for International Cooperation in Higher Education of Taiwan (FICHET) said. At the annual convention of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages held over the weekend in New Orleans, Louisiana, a Taiwan Pavilion was jointly run by 17 representative teams from the FICHET, the Overseas Community Affairs Council, the Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency-Huayu, the
A home-style restaurant opened by a Taiwanese woman in Quezon City in Metro Manila has been featured in the first-ever Michelin Guide honoring exceptional restaurants in the Philippines. The restaurant, Fong Wei Wu (豐味屋), was one of 74 eateries to receive a “Michelin Selected” honor in the guide, while one restaurant received two Michelin stars, eight received one star and 25 were awarded a “Bib Gourmand.” The guide, which was limited to restaurants in Metro Manila and Cebu, was published on Oct. 30. In an interview, Feng Wei Wu’s owner and chef, Linda, said that as a restaurateur in her 60s, receiving an
MORE RETALIATION: China would adopt a long-term pressure strategy to prevent other countries or future prime ministers following in Sanae Takaichi’s steps, an academic said Taiwan should maintain communications with Japan, as Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is to lead a revision of security documents, Taiwanese academics said yesterday. Tensions have risen between Japan and China over remarks by Takaichi earlier this month that the use of force against Taiwan would constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan. Prospect Foundation president Lai I-chung (賴怡忠) yesterday said Takaichi’s stance regarding Taiwan is the same as past Japanese prime ministers, but her position is clearer than that of her predecessors Fumio Kishida and Shigeru Ishiba. Although Japan views a “Taiwan contingency” as a “survival-threatening situation,” which would allow its military to