A subcommittee of the national conference on judicial reform on Wednesday voted in favor of a motion to establish an independent evaluation mechanism with the authority to assess the performance of judges and remove unsuitable judges from courts.
Legal practitioners and members of the public have long expressed their concern over the perceived high number of so-called “dinosaur” judges in the nation’s judicial system.
Chiu Hei-yuan (瞿海源), a sociologist at Academia Sinica, presided over the subcommittee meeting, during which members deliberated on the suggestion to establish an independent mechanism to evaluate judges and to find ways to remove “dinosaur” judges.
Photo: Huang Hsin-po, Taipei Times
Yu Po-hsiang (尤伯祥), a defense lawyer for Sunflower movement activists, said that people who want to file an official complaint against a judge “have to go through the lawyers’ bar association, or through the Judicial Reform Foundation. If there are grounds for a valid case, then it is a protracted process, in which it is filed with the Judicial Evaluation Committee, which is under the Judicial Yuan.”
Kao Jung-chih (高榮志), the foundation’s representative on the subcommittee, said people have the right to a fair trial and the right to appeal perceived injustices or improper conduct by judges, but they cannot file such cases themselves, as the system deprives them of that right.
Kao had said in previous meetings that the Judicial Evaluation Committee has failed its mandate, adding that instead of serving the public, the committee serves to protect “dinosaur” judges, as most of its members have professional ties and came from the judiciary or legal practice circles.
“If someone could file for evaluation against a judge while a litigation was in progress, then the case would drag on for much longer. There is the likelihood of people abusing such a process,” Minister of Justice Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) said, voicing his opposition to the proposal.
Law professor Lin Yu-hsiung (林鈺雄) said he is also against the proposal.
“Only a few nations allow people to directly intervene in the judiciary or file complaints and request for an evaluation of judges. If we want people to trust the judicial system, then we should respect the evaluation results,” Lin said.
Chiu Hei-yuan, who is also the subcommittee convenor, called for a vote on whether to allow people to directly file for complaints against judges and whether to establish an independent evaluation committee with its own budget.
The proposal’s supporters won with 11 votes against nine.
A year-long renovation of Taipei’s Bangka Park (艋舺公園) began yesterday, as city workers fenced off the site and cleared out belongings left by homeless residents who had been living there. Despite protests from displaced residents, a city official defended the government’s relocation efforts, saying transitional housing has been offered. The renovation of the park in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華), near Longshan Temple (龍山寺), began at 9am yesterday, as about 20 homeless people packed their belongings and left after being asked to move by city personnel. Among them was a 90-year-old woman surnamed Wang (王), who last week said that she had no plans
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
RSS