The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed an appeal by prosecutors and upheld a “not guilty” verdict for six former legislators across party lines charged with bribery in a case involving the Taiwan Dental Association’s lobbying of legislators to pass a law in 2003.
The Supreme Court upheld the verdict by the Taiwan High Court in the first retrial, which found the six former legislators — including Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯), Jao Yung-ching (趙永清) and Liao Pen-yen (廖本煙) of the Democratic progressive Party (DPP); the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Chang Tsai-mei (張蔡美); and the People First Party’s Yang Fu-mei (楊富美) — as well as Tsai’s brother Tsai Chao-cheng (蔡朝正) not guilty of accepting bribes from the association in 2003.
However, the Supreme Court ordered a second retrial for former DPP Legislators Lee Ming-hsien (李明憲) and Lee Chen-nan (李鎮楠), who were sentenced to seven years and six months and seven years and two months in prison respectively in their first retrial.
The eight lawmakers and Tsai Chao-cheng were accused of taking bribes from the association to help push through the Oral Health Act (口腔健康法), which was passed in April 2003.
Tsai Huang-liang was accused of taking a NT$3.5 million (US$105,736 at the current exchange rate) bribe from the association through his brother, while the seven other legislators were accused of taking bribes of NT$1 million or NT$500,000 each.
The district court found all defendants not guilty in the first instance in 2010, but the High Court in 2011 found all nine of the defendants guilty and sentenced them to between seven years and two months and eight years behind bars.
The ruling was appealed to the Supreme Court, which ordered a retrial.
According to last year’s March retrial verdict, prosecutors failed to prove that Tsai Chao-cheng had taken bribes on behalf of his brother and they failed to prove that Tsai Huang-liang knew about the bribes and that there was a quid pro quo relationship in which Tsai Huang-liang altered his behavior as a legislator in exchange for the payment.
Prosecutors also failed to prove a quid pro quo relationship involving five other legislators, according to the retrial verdict.
EVA Airways today confirmed the death of a flight attendant on Saturday upon their return to Taiwan and said an internal investigation has been launched, as criticism mounted over a social media post accusing the airline of failing to offer sufficient employee protections. According to the post, the flight attendant complained of feeling sick on board a flight, but was unable to take sick leave or access medical care. The crew member allegedly did not receive assistance from the chief purser, who failed to heed their requests for medical attention or call an ambulance once the flight landed, the post said. As sick
A drunk woman was sexually assaulted inside a crowded concourse of Taipei Railway Station on Thursday last week before a foreign tourist notified police, leading to calls for better education on bystander intervention and review of security infrastructure. The man, surnamed Chiu (邱), was taken into custody on charges of sexual assault, taking advantage of the woman’s condition and public indecency. Police discovered that Chiu was a fugitive with prior convictions for vehicle theft. He has been taken into custody and is to complete his unserved six-month sentence, police said. On Thursday last week, Chiu was seen wearing a white
EVA Airways, one of the leading international carriers in Taiwan, yesterday said that it was investigating reports that a cabin crew manager had ignored the condition of a sick flight attendant, who died on Saturday. The airline made the statement in response to a post circulating on social media that said that the flight attendant on an outbound flight was feeling sick and notified the cabin crew manager. Although the flight attendant grew increasingly ill on the return flight, the manager did not contact Medlink — a system that connects the aircraft to doctors on the ground for treatment advice during medical
The Taichung District Court yesterday confirmed its final ruling that the marriage between teenage heir Lai (賴) and a man surnamed Hsia (夏) was legally invalid, preventing Hsia from inheriting Lai’s NT$500 million (US$16.37 million) estate. The court confirmed that Hsia chose not to appeal the civil judgement after the court handed down its ruling in June, making the decision final. In the June ruling, the court said that Lai, 18, and Hsia, 26, showed “no mutual admiration before the marriage” and that their interactions were “distant and unfamiliar.” The judge concluded that the couple lacked the “true intention of