The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office on Friday said that it cannot accept the Taiwan High Court’s ruling on Farglory Land Development Co (遠雄建設) chairman Chao Teng-hsiung (趙藤雄), while legal experts said that the ruling seemed to serve wealthy and powerful elites.
The Taiwan High Court on Friday sentenced Chao to two years in prison for paying bribes to secure the contracts for three housing construction projects, with the sentence suspended for five years.
Chao was also fined NT$200 million (US$6.1 million) and had his civil rights suspended for two years. As Chao was not guilty of a major offense, the court’s verdict was final.
A statement issued by the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office said it will not rule out filing an extraordinary appeal.
“Our nation’s laws have always been lenient on people who paid bribes. Oftentimes when they are caught, they admit to wrongdoing and receive reduced punishments or suspended sentences. I was not too surprised at the outcome of Chao’s trial,” former Judicial Reform Foundation executive director Kao Yung-cheng (高涌誠) said.
When the court allowed Chao, who is the head of a large corporation and owns great personal wealth, to make a donation in lieu of serving a prison term, Kao said it re-enforced the commonly-held perception that Taiwan’s legal system “lets the defendant live if they are rich, but receive the death sentence if they are poor.”
“It seems the courts are now exclusively in the service of wealthy and powerful elites,” Kao said.”
Lawyer Chou Wu-jung (周武榮) said that Chao’s belated admission to all the charges in the extra hearing session two weeks ago must have had very little influence on the ruling.
“To give Chao a suspended sentence in this case does not conform with the spirit of the law,” Chou said. “Also, the financial gains Chao has made through bribing government officials to secure construction projects most likely exceeded the amount he was ordered to pay as a donation, which is NT$200 million. For most people, it is very difficult to accept the trial’s outcome.”
Chou said that to implement the legal practice of granting reduced punishments to those who admit to being guilty, the admission must help the investigation and the trial.
“It is supposed to help clarify the details of the case and to reveal the nature of the crime. However, Chao and his company executive Wei (魏) only pleaded guilty to all charges just before the court was to announce its decision for the second ruling on the case,” he said, referring to former Farglory deputy chairman Wei Chun-hsiung (魏春雄), a codefendant in the case, who also pleaded guilty to the charges at the extra hearing, and received a sentence of 22 months in prison, suspended for five years, as well as a fine of NT$100 million.
“At that time, the judicial system had already spent resources on the investigation and legal proceedings of the case. The defendants’ crimes were more or less clear to most people by then,” Chou said.
“However, the High Court handed out lenient sentences to Chao and Wei, and allowed them to donate a sum of money in lieu of serving jail time. The ruling was clearly contrary to the spirit of the law, regarding sentence reduction,” he said.
Chao and Wei pleading guilty that late into the trial and still being rewarded with leniency would let others suspects to follow suit, Chou said.
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods