Liberty Times (LT): Taiwanese films won in 12 categories at the latest Golden Horse Awards, which is a majority of the categories. By all appearances, it was a successful performance, but directors Hou Hsiao-hsien (侯孝賢) and Ang Lee (李安) said Taiwanese films did not win enough awards. What is your take?
Wu Nien-jen (吳念真): What does it matter how many awards were or were not won? The Golden Horse has an ongoing struggle with an identity crisis, although it should be said that it is improving in that regard.
In the past, the Golden Horse consistently rewarded Mandarin-language films and it is tough for Hoklo-language [commonly known as Taiwanese] films to participate. For example, Dust in the Wind (戀戀風塵) had very few lines in Mandarin and was licensed as a Hoklo-language film; it was very nearly excluded from the Golden Horse Awards.
Photo: Pan Shao-tang, Taipei Times
In earlier times, the Golden Horse had a strong political flavor. Patriotic, anti-communist films were guaranteed to win an award. There was one year when they awarded the best film to a movie that was not even considered for best director or best screenplay. Now the Golden Horse is more fair and open.
I think Hou and Lee said Taiwan did not win enough awards as an exhortation, because we did not try hard enough and we were not productive enough. This is a warning: If you do not fight, you do not gain.
LT: What do you think the future holds for the Golden Horse Awards? What could be done better?
Wu: When a film festival grows a personality, roll with it. My suggestion would be making the deliberations of the judges more transparent and emphasize its fairness and objectivity, so that people would understand the reasoning behind decisions.
LT: If you are chosen as a judge for the next Golden Horse Awards, what would you do?
Wu: In its defense, the Golden Horse Awards has done well in recent years. They have good judges. The awards have a broader perspective and are more open-minded than in the past. Once we have made certain that the event’s reputation is established in Taiwan, Hong Kong and China, I would not be too concerned with the nationality of the event’s participating films.
LT: There is a huge market and a lot of capital in China. Many talented young people are going to China because they do not want to be constrained by Taiwan’s funding and business environment. What do you think is the way forward for the next generation of Taiwanese directors?
Wu: You have to accept reality. Filmmaking cannot be caged in Taiwan. How are you going to make Ang Lee films in Taiwan? Was his brain not drained?
Saying this might offend people, but filmmaking is nothing special. You chose something; you have to live with it. It is like founding a theater company; you should not crank them out left and right just to make the government subsidize you. You are not some big shot who is better than everybody else, you chose this.
We were the people who got the government to subsidize cinema in the first place. At the time, our thinking was, helping one good film to the international stage is better than sending 10 diplomats. Artistic films often have trouble convincing studios agents, because many of those agents do not know about film art. So we need the government to provide funding to directors with potential to shoot films for the international stage; but it eventually became a game for spoils.
I believe Taiwan’s dilemma is the small market, unlike Chinese cinema. Chinese cinema is a world to itself. With 1.3 billion people, a blockbuster can make a lot of money. Taiwan has 23 million people, which is too small. If filmmaking does not expand beyond the local market, it does not have a fighting chance.
LT: Access to the Chinese market is not that easy for Taiwanese films. Do you think the government has a role to play?
Wu: Negotiate with Beijing, go talk to them; if there is freedom on both sides, the markets can make exchanges across the divide.
But politics as always is a stumbling block. We have restrictions on imports from China and, of course, they have restrictions on our exports. They might also censor the content. Once there are restrictions like this, freedom is diminished.
If China can become a free market that Taiwan can participate in, then that is something we could sink our teeth into.
LT: After the Jan. 16 elections, what do you hope for film and cultural policy?
Wu: How the government could help the film industry is the same talk I have heard time and again for 40 years. My answer is the same: “The government? I am grateful if they do not mess me up!”
The government should help from a good vantage point, such as imports of equipment, taxation, a transparent system of tallying box office sales instead of taking the studio’s word for it and an expedited process for getting foreign technicians work permits in Taiwan.
LT: Film director Ko I-chen (柯一正) and metal band Chthonic’s Freddy Lim (林昶佐) are participating in the legislative elections. What are your thoughts on that?
Wu: Ko is correct in his thinking that the blue and green camps are from the same political networks and neither have the time of day for new challenges. Ko thinks that having fresh people in the legislature might give us a new voice, and that is not so bad. We should encourage them, but not individually. Votes should be distributed to maximize the New Power Party’s gains, to send more [of their candidates] to the legislature.
From another perspective, Taiwan has already started on a new direction. Fresh faces showed through last year’s Nov. 29 county commissioner and city mayor elections, and youthful vitality cannot be contained. If political parties do not respect that, they will die horribly. I have heard some young friends — and even a few stubborn old gentlemen — who said the elections are already over and voting is unnecessary.
LT: The government is promoting “cultural and creative” [industry] more than cinema. Hou said the cultural and creative industry is a sham. What do you think?
Wu: I agree. I am sick and tired of the phrase. How can you be “culturally creative” when you have no creativity? I think it is a bunch of maniacs blabbering nonsense. I do not know a single thing they “culturally created.” Drawings on T-shirts is called “culturally creative?” Idiots. There is no vision in what the government is supporting. It is idiocy.
LT: In comparison to the mass production of the cultural and creative industry, the documentary Fly, Kite Fly (老鷹想飛) took 23 years to make. Why did you volunteer to do voiceover work on it without pay?
Wu: They had their work cut out for them, so I helped any way I could. The central figure in the documentary, Mr Eagle, Shen Chen-chung (沈振中), was one of my subjects in [the book] Nien-jen on Taiwan (台灣念真情). The people left in Taiwan who are still willing to spend this kind of time to do something deserve encouragement. They know what they do might swallow their fortunes and they still give it all they have. That is why seeing politicians puts me in a mood fit for a rampage; they have no heart for work. They do everything for an angle, to advance their careers and self-interest.
Translated by Jonathan Chin, staff writer.
Typhoon Champi is forecast to turn northward earlier than previously expected, sparing Taiwan a direct hit but still bringing heavy rain to the north of the country on Friday and Saturday, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Typhoon Champi had strengthened and increased in size over the past 12 hours, and as of yesterday afternoon, was packing sustained winds of 198kph near its center, CWA forecaster Cheng Chieh-jen (鄭傑仁) said. However, due to the weakening of a Pacific high-pressure system the storm is now expected to turn northward earlier than initially forecast, likely around Japan’s Ishigaki Island, Cheng said. As Champi brushes
A sea warning for Typhoon Champi might be issued tonight, while the storm’s trajectory would determine whether a land warning is to be issued tomorrow night, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. As of 2pm yesterday, Champi was about 1,536km east-southeast of Taiwan proper’s southernmost point, Oluanpi (鵝鑾鼻), packing maximum sustained winds of 198kph, CWA forecaster Tseng Chao-cheng (曾昭誠) said. The storm was moving west-northwest at 23kph and was expected to strengthen over the next 24 hours before weakening slightly as it approaches cooler waters east of Taiwan, Tseng said. Champi is expected to turn north tomorrow, with the angle of the
DEFENSE PROCUREMENT: Taiwan could become the largest operator of V-BAT drones outside the US if the contract is finalized, the Ministry of National Defense said The navy and the coast guard reportedly plan to acquire 292 units of MQ-35A V-BAT vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) surveillance drones. If the contract is awarded and finalized, it would make Taiwan one of the largest buyers of the uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV) developed by the US-based defense technology company Shield AI. The Coast Guard Administration budgeted NT$1.2 billion (US$37.1 million) to buy 12 drones, which have been delivered, Shield AI said in a report on Oct 13. The navy is planning to spend NT$36 billion under a four-year program code-named Project Yuan Hsiao (遠鴞) to acquire 280 V-BAT drones,
A patrol vessel donated by the Coast Guard Administration (CGA) to the Philippines would not be used in waters near Taiwan or areas where Taiwanese fishing vessels operate, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said yesterday. The vessel, formerly the CGA's 500-tonne-class Kinmen (金門), was commissioned into the Philippine Coast Guard on Oct. 2. Speaking at the Legislative Yuan, Cho said the Philippines had pledged during the donation process that the vessel would be used only for designated missions and would not operate in waters related to Taiwan. The vessel could even provide assistance to Taiwan if needed, he added. Responding to questions from Chinese
RSS