A group of high-school students and young China-centered history advocates yesterday said they supported the changes the Ministry of Education (MOE) has proposed for the high-school history curriculum and urged it to stand firm against opposing views.
Following a wave of protests against the adjustments by history professors and students, political figures and high-school teachers over the past two weeks, a dozen young people, referring to themselves as the Anti-Independence-Oriented-History Front, yesterday defended the ministry.
Comprised of the Alliance of Students Safeguarding the Nation’s History, the New Youth Justice Alliance and the Association of New Chinese Children, the Front members raised banners that read: “No compromise to bringing order to chaos” and “Say No to Kominka education” in front of the ministry building in Taipei.
Photo: CNA
The Kominka movement refers to the Japanese endeavor during the Japanese colonial period to make Taiwanese loyal subjects of the emperor.
People at the rally said that the ministry’s adjustments were only to “justifiably have history written more in line with the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution” and said that they are people of ROC, not Japan’s imperial subjects.
Hou Han-ting (侯漢廷), a graduate political science student at National Taiwan University and the head of the school’s China Rise Club, said the textbook was “the execution of the will of the state” and so should teach history from the ROC’s point of view rather than from a Taiwanese independence viewpoint.
“The adjustments are only small changes to bring order to the chaos [incurred by the Democratic Progressive Party administration during its eight years in power],” Hou said.
“What’s wrong with telling the truth about Taiwanese history of Japanese persecuting Taiwanese and forcing some to become comfort women?” Hou added.
Chinese Culture University history graduate student Lin Ming-cheng (林明正) criticized the current textbook for introducing Taiwanese temples that enshrine Japanese police from the Japanese colonial period.
Lin showed pictures of Tainan City’s temples enshrining Koxinga (國姓爺) for “the re-conquest of Taiwan” and academic and bureaucrat Lin Zexu’s (林則徐) action against opium in 1838, pointing out that these cases indicated “the real Taiwanese society has a China-centered view of history.”
New Chinese Children Association head Wang Puchen (王炳忠) said critics who accused the MOE of acting to “de-Taiwanize” the nation had “blemished” the government’s effort, adding that the changes are not to devalue Taiwan, but to get rid of Kominka thinking.
“Real Taiwanese history can be seen as the history of modern China being encroached by colonial empires,” Wang said, adding that localization is not equal to Taiwanese independence.
Hou, Lin and Wang were the leaders of the movements supporting pro-China Want Want China Times Group in last year's media monopolization controversy.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS