The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will not revise the “Taiwan independence clause” in its party charter, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) said while reiterating that Taiwan’s democracy will remain a beacon of hope for the people of Hong Kong and China.
Su made the remarks in response to a question from a Chinese student during a question-and-answer session after his talk on the future responsibilities of the DPP at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies on Friday.
The comment also marked the first straight-forward response from Su regarding the party’s “Taiwan independence clause” after recent debate on the clause within the party in which DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) suggested that the clause be frozen because it had already done its part in the party’s history.
The Chinese student in the audience said that from his understanding, Taiwan was a sovereign nation and he asked whether there was a possibility that the DPP could amend its “Taiwan independence clause” to promote democracy in all the regions of the “greater zhonghua culture” (大中華文化).
Stating that the party would not amend the clause, Su said that the most important thing for Taiwan, as a sovereign country, is to develop itself, rather than shouting pro-independence slogans.
“It’s akin to shouting: ‘I am a male’ when I already am, or wondering if I am a male simply because others do not think so,” Su said. “The most important thing is to have confidence in ourselves.”
In his talk, Su emphasized that “if Taiwan can establish a democracy, so can you” in reference to China, and cited the many Taiwanese who had gone abroad in the Martial Law period to experience democracy in its many forms.
He said many Chinese are today doing the same, namely going abroad, and “we believe that they can successfully take what they learn abroad back to China.”
Su said China may not like Taiwan’s style of democracy and may be put off due to the constant fights in the Legislative Yuan.
However, he added: “You [China] can invent a better democracy and we will respect that. At least we [Taiwan] are not like some one-party countries where the second-most powerful person suddenly disappears, and we don’t know if he’s been killed by machine guns or eaten by dogs, or where the richest man suddenly has all his property taken. Such a thing would not happen in Taiwan.”
“Taiwan stands on the front lines of China’s expansion, and Taiwan is in essence ‘the canary in the coal mine’ and can serve as an example to other countries that may have some disputes with China,” he added.
“We also understand that democratic Taiwan, although small, has become a source of hope for Chinese and Hong Kong democrats and we have responsibilities to them, too,” he said. “We stand ready to defend our democracy, and we will not give in. Here I would like to copy Winston Churchill, who said in October 1941: ‘Never give in, never, never, never.’”
A year-long renovation of Taipei’s Bangka Park (艋舺公園) began yesterday, as city workers fenced off the site and cleared out belongings left by homeless residents who had been living there. Despite protests from displaced residents, a city official defended the government’s relocation efforts, saying transitional housing has been offered. The renovation of the park in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華), near Longshan Temple (龍山寺), began at 9am yesterday, as about 20 homeless people packed their belongings and left after being asked to move by city personnel. Among them was a 90-year-old woman surnamed Wang (王), who last week said that she had no plans
China might accelerate its strategic actions toward Taiwan, the South China Sea and across the first island chain, after the US officially entered a military conflict with Iran, as Beijing would perceive Washington as incapable of fighting a two-front war, a military expert said yesterday. The US’ ongoing conflict with Iran is not merely an act of retaliation or a “delaying tactic,” but a strategic military campaign aimed at dismantling Tehran’s nuclear capabilities and reshaping the regional order in the Middle East, said National Defense University distinguished adjunct lecturer Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), former McDonnell Douglas Aerospace representative in Taiwan. If
TO BE APPEALED: The environment ministry said coal reduction goals had to be reached within two months, which was against the principle of legitimate expectation The Taipei High Administrative Court on Thursday ruled in favor of the Taichung Environmental Protection Bureau in its administrative litigation against the Ministry of Environment for the rescission of a NT$18 million fine (US$609,570) imposed by the bureau on the Taichung Power Plant in 2019 for alleged excess coal power generation. The bureau in November 2019 revised what it said was a “slip of the pen” in the text of the operating permit granted to the plant — which is run by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) — in October 2017. The permit originally read: “reduce coal use by 40 percent from Jan.
‘SPEY’ REACTION: Beijing said its Eastern Theater Command ‘organized troops to monitor and guard the entire process’ of a Taiwan Strait transit China sent 74 warplanes toward Taiwan between late Thursday and early yesterday, 61 of which crossed the median line in the Taiwan Strait. It was not clear why so many planes were scrambled, said the Ministry of National Defense, which tabulated the flights. The aircraft were sent in two separate tranches, the ministry said. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday “confirmed and welcomed” a transit by the British Royal Navy’s HMS Spey, a River-class offshore patrol vessel, through the Taiwan Strait a day earlier. The ship’s transit “once again [reaffirmed the Strait’s] status as international waters,” the foreign ministry said. “Such transits by
RSS