When it comes to how political leaders in a democratic society are assessed, in addition to whether they follow the rule of law, the public’s perception of them is also an important indicator, a long-term US observer of Taiwan said recently in Taipei.
Charles Irish, emeritus professor of law at the University of Wisconsin Law School in Madison, Wisconsin, and senior director of the East Asian Legal Studies Center at the university, made the remarks in an interview with the Taipei Times on Tuesday.
Given that the basis of the US legal system differs from that of Taiwan, Irish was hesitant to say whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had failed to abide by the law and Constitution in what have been perceived as his recent attempts to oust Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
Irish offered his comments according to the public’s perception, saying that “the public certainly has a sense” that Ma has overstepped his power.
Irish drew a parallel between the situation Ma is facing and that experienced by former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra when the tax-free sale of his telecommunication company Shin Corp to Singapore’s Temasek Holdings in 2006 incited an outcry from the public which is said to have led to his downfall.
Although most Thais agreed that “the sale was legal under Thai law,” the people thought that “he [Thaksin] was wrong,” Irish said.
Ma might insist that he has followed the law, but public perception is that what he did was wrong and that he abused his power, Irish said.
“You go out onto the streets and you talk to taxi drivers. The average people don’t know about the rules, but they have a sense. That probably is a good indicator of whether what [Ma] did was right or wrong,” Irish said.
“The public feels that what he did is wrong and that is very important in a democratic society. It’s not necessarily whether it [what Ma did] is technically legal, it’s the public perception of what is right or wrong,” he added.
Over the course of his career, Irish has traveled to about 80 countries and done extensive advisory work on tax reform and trade policy in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Caribbean.
He first visited Taiwan in 1984 when the country was still under martial law and had just suffered the impact of the US’ shift in recognition to China a few years before, and was grappling with diplomatic recognition worldwide.
Irish said he was struck by “the spirit of the people” of Taiwan; a spirit of “independence” and “resilience” that he said made Taiwan different.
There is a tendency for countries that are having a hard time to blame foreigners, but Taiwanese use their intelligence and work hard to survive, he said.
Over the past 25 years, Irish has worked with people in the government, mainly in the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
The people he knows in the government “are really interested in trying to find better ways to do things,” he said.
The US’ democratic system has been sustained for nearly 250 years, but it still has shortcomings as shown by the recent conflict between US President Barack Obama’s administration and the Republican-controlled US House of Representatives over budget and debt issues, Irish said.
There are always bumps in the road to democracy, Irish said.
Taiwan also has problems in its young but “fully functional democracy,” but “I don’t think it has as much of a problem in [Taiwan] as some other places in the world,” Irish said, adding that he holds a positive view on its development.